Filter by Date
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Pradeep Jain Vs. Smt. Manjulata Jain Modi and another

Criminal Revision, 704 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 05, 2018

Law laid down - "Whether the children of the first husband of the wife is entitled to get maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C." Held - No. Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Anil Dhakad S/o Benisingh Dhakad Vs. State of M.P. through

MCRC, 6500 of 2018, Judgment Date: Jul 05, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Sanjay Bhadoriya vs. State of MP

MCRC, .22796 of 2018, Judgment Date: Jul 04, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Himmatlal and others Vs. M/s Rajratan Concept and others

Civil Revision, 191 of 2014, Judgment Date: Jul 03, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Patru S/o Kapura Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Criminal Appeal, 600 of 2000, Judgment Date: Jun 29, 2018

Law laid down - In this case, Bharosa was injured on 8.8.1998 and was medically examined on same day and his x-ray examination was conducted on 10.8.1998 and in his M.L.C. and x-ray report, there was no indication about any grievous injury received by him and during treatment he died on 28.8.1998 and according to unchallenged evidence of autopsy surgeon, Bharosa died of failure of surgical operation and due to perforation peritonitis as a result of blunt injury to abdomen and its Full Judgment

Tags Murder
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Surendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others

RP, 638 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jun 28, 2018

Law Laid Down - Simple self-serving statement that the petitioners are social workers is not sufficient to invoke the public interest writ jurisdiction of this Court unless the petitioners are able to produce on record to the satisfaction of the Court such social work in last couple of years is in the area in respect of which the public interest writ petition is filed. Public interest litigation in respect of acquisition of land at the instance of third person would not be Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Narsingh v/s Vikram Viswavidyalaya

WRIT PETITION, 8502 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 28, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Jaheeruddin vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

MCRC, 18613 of 2018, Judgment Date: Jun 28, 2018

Law Laid Down -  Bail u/s. 438/439 of Cr.P.C. - Article 51-A of the Constitution of India - emphasis made on the compliance of fundamental duties. Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Rashmi Boudh & others v. State of M.P. & others

WRIT PETITION, 12716 of 2018, Judgment Date: Jun 27, 2018

Law Laid Down - Madhya Pradesh Junior Administrative Service (Recruitments and Service Conditions of Service) Rules, 2011 (for short “the 2011 Rules”) contemplate that the candidates should have served at least for five years as Patwari in permanent or officiating capacity. In terms of the Scheme of appointment and the 2011 Rules, the petitioners were appointed to the service only after completion of training and on qualifying the written examination. Therefore, the period prior to their appointment to the service cannot Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Ramji Tiwari & others v. State of M.P. & others

WRIT PETITION, 12602 of 2018, Judgment Date: Jun 27, 2018

Law Laid Down - No age is contemplated in respect of limited competitive examination either in Rule 6 or Rule 13 of Madhya Pradesh Junior Administrative Service (Recruitments and Service Conditions of Service) Rules, 2011 (“in short “the Rules”). Therefore, the Schedule-V of the Rules prescribing the age limit for filling of the posts of Naib Tehsildar from amongst the Patwaris or Revenue Inspectors is without any corresponding support from the substantive provisions of the Rules. In view of the said fact, Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Shivnarayan Verma (Panchal) Vs. Anjuman Ismail Muslemin & others

SA, 328 of 2016, Judgment Date: Jun 25, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Appeal
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Sardar Singh & Ors. Versus State of M.P.

CRR, 156 of 2009, Judgment Date: Jun 25, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Bail
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Manish Parashar Vs. Pratap & Others

MP, 571 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jun 25, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Union of India & Others vs. M/s. K. Kapoor & P.R. Mahant Khandwa

Civil Revision, 547 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jun 22, 2018

Law laid down - It is a mandatory requirement to file original or certified copy of the agreement alongwith the application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for referring the matter for arbitration in a pending suit. Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Managing Director, M.P. Poorva Kshetra Vidhyut Vitran Co. Ltd and another Vs. Presiding Officer, Appellate Authority and another

WRIT PETITION, 8539 of 2016, Judgment Date: Jun 22, 2018

Law laid down - The consumer, who is not indulged in an unathorised use of electricity on the basis of provisions of Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003, although having connected load beyond the sanctioned load, in such a situation, no penal tariff can be charged. Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/s Kesar Multimodal Logistics Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Others

WRIT PETITION, 12620 of 2018, Judgment Date: Jun 22, 2018

Law Laid Down - The Reserve Bank of India has issued the circular dated 12.02.2018 in exercise of its statutory functions, therefore, the circular has a statutory force in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court reported as (2002) 1 SCC 367 (Central Bank of  India vs. Ravindra and others) and therefore, there cannot be any estopple against a Statute. The decision of the Banks: as to whether the account of the petitioner should be treated under SDR mechanism or the Full Judgment

Tags Financial
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Dr. D.P. Singh & others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others

WRIT PETITION, 12713 of 2018, Judgment Date: Jun 22, 2018

Law Laid Down - Even if there is a mistake in the advertisement in respect of available posts for general category or for reserved category candidates, that will not confer any cause of action upon the petitioners to dispute the selection process as the candidates have to be appointed in respect of posts available but generally not exceeding the posts advertised. The State would be well advised to calculate the backlog vacancies and to fill the seats keeping in view the advertisement Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Dr. Avinash Mishra & others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others

WRIT PETITION, 12747 of 2018, Judgment Date: Jun 22, 2018

Law Laid Down - The State has a right to assess the suitability of a candidate for appointment with or without interview. The State having exercised the jurisdiction in terms of Madhya Pradesh Educational Service (Collegiate Branch) Recruitment Rules, 1990 (for short “the 1990 Rules”), it cannot be said that power of relaxation to do away with the interview is illegal.  In exercise of power of judicial review, this Court examines the jurisdiction to relax the Rules. Since there is explicit power Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Lalji Chaudhary Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh

MCRC, 18356 of 2018, Judgment Date: Jun 21, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Bail Rape
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Manurai Samaj Dharshala Nyas Vs. The Registrar of Public Trust and another

WRIT PETITION, 5664 of 2016, Judgment Date: Jun 19, 2018

Full Judgment