Filter by Date
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Chhedilal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others

WRIT PETITION, 21957 of 2013, Judgment Date: Oct 29, 2018

Law laid down - Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 Section 8, 9 and 10- the notification under  Section 10(1) is required to be issued in respect of “vacant land in excess of the ceiling limit.” “Such land” is to be acquired by issuance of notification under Section 10(1) and 3 of the Act. However, determination of such excess vacant land is based on draft statement followed by final statement prepared under Section 8 and 9 of the Act. Once such Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Raj Kumar Kol Versus State of Madhya Pradesh

Criminal Appeal, 5786 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 26, 2018

Law laid dow - Fingering into the vagina would be a rape within the definition of rape under Section 375 of IPC as substituted by Act No.13 of 2013 w.e.f. 03-02-2013. Taking into consideration the totality of the facts, nature, motive and the manner of the offence, capital punishment is commuted to the Rigorous imprisonment for a period of 20 years and fine of Rs.10,000/-. Full Judgment

Tags Murder Rape
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Veerendra Pratap Singh Versus Sanjaya Kumar Tibude

MA, 3315 of 2010, Judgment Date: Oct 25, 2018

Law laid down - Amendment application based on subsequent developments can be allowed at any stage of the trial or appeal, if the same does not cause prejudice to the other side. The cross objection in the appeal against appellate order can be made. In cross objection a decree can be passed. The cross objection takes the place of appeal after it is filed. Suit for declaration of title filed without claiming a alternative relief of possession, the suit would not be barred Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Siddhi Vinayak & Another Vs. Union of India & Others

WRIT PETITION, 21438 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 25, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Ramswaroop Singh Gurjar vs. State of MP & Ors.

WRIT PETITION, 6031 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 25, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Pay Financial
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

M/s S.Kumars Ltd. Vs. Bherulal

WRIT PETITION, 3932 of 2017, Judgment Date: Oct 25, 2018

Law Laid down - (1) Before effecting change of service conditions of the workman in respect of any matter specified in Fourth Schedule appended to Industrial Disputes Act, notice has to be issued in compliance of section 9A of the Industrial Disputes Act. (2) The illegal change in service conditions of the Workman in the manner prejudicial and detrimental to his rights and interest amounts to unfair labour practice, on the part of the Management as detailed in item Nos.6 and 7 of Full Judgment

Tags Pay
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Aram Bai vs. Pratap Singh (Dead) through Lrs & Others

WRIT PETITION, 6072 of 2013, Judgment Date: Oct 25, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Prakash Chandra Pandey vs. The State of MP & Ors.

WRIT PETITION, 7675 of 2011, Judgment Date: Oct 24, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Motilal Gupta Versus Gaya Prasad (since deceased) and others

MP, 4998 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 22, 2018

Law laid down - It is no longer res integra that an executing Court can neither travel behind decree nor sit in appeal over the same. It is only in limited cases where the decree is passed by a Court lacking inherent jurisdiction or is a nullity that the same is rendered non est and is thus un- executable. An erroneous decree cannot be equalled with one which is nullity. Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/s. IDEA Cellular Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Tax & others

WRIT PETITION, 6304 of 2011, Judgment Date: Oct 22, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Smt. (Dr.) Sajni Bajaj Vs. Indore Development Authority & Ors.

WRIT PETITION, 15286 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 12, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Kalyan Singh Versus State of M.P.

Criminal Appeal, 489 of 2011, Judgment Date: Oct 12, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Bail
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Jagdish Vs. State of M.P.

Criminal Appeal, 1112 of 2014, Judgment Date: Oct 12, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Bail
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Saurabh Singh Baghel & Others Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & Others

WRIT PETITION, 18935 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 11, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Taranjeet Singh Hora & Anr. Vs. State of M.P.

MCRC, 18921 of 2017, Judgment Date: Oct 11, 2018

Law laid down - [1] After registration of the first FIR the subsequent FIR for offence committed in the course of same transaction or offence arising as a consequence of prior offence, is not permissible and the subsequent complaint in such cases applying the test of “sameness” and “consequence” can be treated as statement under Section 161(3) of the Cr.P.C. in the FIR already registered but if the subsequent complaint is in regard to same incident but filed as a counter Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

State of Madhya Pradesh Versus Rajesh Singh

Criminal Appeal, 1665 of 2000, Judgment Date: Oct 11, 2018

Law laid down - Penetration is sufficient to constitute sexual intercourse for offence of rape. Complete penetration is not essential. Full Judgment

Tags Rape
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Novartis India Limited Vs. Vipin Shrivastava & others

WA, 75 of 2017, Judgment Date: Oct 11, 2018

Law Laid Down - The supervisory capacity necessarily has to be examined keeping in view the manual, unskilled, skilled, clerical work and the person performing such work is a “workman”. Meeting different professionals to promote sale of product of Pharmaceutical Company cannot be said to be manual or clerical work done by the Medical Representatives as it requires knowledge of product, its uses and also persuasive skills. May be, the Medical Representative does not supervise any person but he is the Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission Versus Dr. Deepak Singh & others

WA, 1011 of 2017, Judgment Date: Oct 05, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

Om Kar Mahole Versus State of Madhya Pradesh And Others

WA, 880 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 04, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Yusuf Khan vs. State of MP

Criminal Appeal, 133 of 2007, Judgment Date: Oct 04, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Bail