Judgments - Madhya Pradesh High Court
Lawrence Robertson Vs. Smt. Vani Jogi & Anr.
Law laid down - A father is bound to maintain his child according to his own status. He cannot shirk the responsibility of maintaining his child only because his wife/mother of the child is working. Full Judgment
Smt. Samiksha Jain vs. State of M.P.
M/s Som Distilleries Pvt. Ltd. vs. Excise Commissioner & Ors.
M/s Associated Alcohol & Breweries Ltd. vs. State of M.P. & Anr.
M/s Associated Alcohol & Breweries Ltd. vs. State of M.P. & Ors.
Lalji S/o Bihari Lal Vs. State of M.P. and others
Law laid down - During execution proceedings for recovery of compensation awarded under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, award holder died........, the legal representatives of the deceased-award holder are therefore, required to produce succession certificate to enable them to prosecute the execution proceedings. Full Judgment
Smt. Pooja Parihar Vs. State of M.P. and others
Boodhe @ Roop Singh Vs. The State of M.P.
Law laid down - The Evidence Act nowhere says that evidence of the prosecutrix cannot be accepted unless it is corroborated by any material particulars. The requirement of material for corroboration depends on the facts and circumstances of each case applying the rule of prudence. But if the prosecutrix is an adult and of full understanding the court is entitled to base a conviction on her evidence unless the same is shown to be infirm and not trustworthy. If the totality of the circumstances appearing on Full Judgment
Rakesh Rathore & Another vs. State of MP & Anr
Suresh Singh Bhadoria Versus Central Bureau of Investigtion
Law laid down - In terms of Section 170(1) of CrPC, the investigating agency is mandated to produce an accused into custody for the non-bailable offence. The argument that the Court should have issued summons in respect of such offence, cannot be accepted. Inherent power of judicial review under Section 482 of CrPC presupposes that the Court is required to see whether the trial Court has abused the process of law or it is necessary to annul the proceedings for securing the Full Judgment
Sachin Rathi Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Limited and another
M/s.Anik Industries Ltd Vs. M/s.DCM Shriram Consolidated Ltd
Law laid down - [a] If the arbitration clause is contained in the annexure to the contract document and the annexure is specifically mentioned therein, then the arbitration agreement exists between the parties. [b] Sec.8 of the Act mandates a judicial authority to refer the parties to arbitration in case whether pending action is subject matter of an arbitration agreement and in such cases the judicial authority does not commit any error in disposing of the civil action while referring the Full Judgment
Somdatt Mishra Vs. The State of M.P. & Another
Law Laid down - 1- When a complainant is restrained by the public authority to commit any illegal act and with motive to overcome such situation, any complaint under section 354 of IPC or like nature has been filed against the public servant, then it is the duty of the Investigating Officer to investigate thoroughly and reach to the motive if any exist, for which the complaint has been filed against the public servant. 2- Harassment of the public servant on pretext Full Judgment
Smt. Manju Pathak vs. Munshi Singh Gurjar
RAJENDRA SINGH AND ANR. Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR.
Law Laid down - 1. Sec. 53-A and Sec. 164-A inserted in the Cr.P.C by way of Amendment Act 2005 which makes the DNA profiling of accused and victim must, is a step towards more Forensic and Scientific Investigation. Therefore, if the DNA report is supported by medical evidence, wherein injuries to the prosecutrix are not sustained over the private parts or over her person and attending circumstances, do not corroborate in any manner, then false implication of the accused can Full Judgment
Ku. Surabhi Baghel Versus High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur
Law laid down - Scope of interference – In academic matters in framing of questions, evaluation of answers and finalisation of model answers – the Court cannot and should not act as Court of appeal, but to leave the same to academicians and experts. Full Judgment
Hemant Bakolia Vs. State of MP & Ors.
Law laid down - Rounding off of the marks is not permissible contrary to the expressed language of the Rule containing the mandatory condition of obtaining atleast 50% marks in each paper. In a competitive examination each fraction of marks has a bearing on the result of the participating candidate and if in such a case rounding off of marks is allowed that will defeat the very principle of assessing comparative merit. No revaluation of answer sheet can be directed in the absence of any Full Judgment