Judgments - Madhya Pradesh High Court
Inderchand Jain (died) through L.R.s Verus Shyamlal Vyas (died) through L.R.s
Anirudh Khehuriya vs State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - Judicial Magistrate cannot alter or modify the conditions of the bail order passed by it. Same can be modified or altered by Sessions Court or High Court exercising its power under Section 439(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Full Judgment
Sayaji Hotels Ltd Vs. Indore Municipal Corporation & Ors.
Law laid down - An authority empowered to hear the appeal is required to hear the parties himself and decide it. If one authority hears the appeal and other authority decides it, then such a decision is faulty and not in consonance with the principles of natural justice. Full Judgment
Union Bank of India & another vs. Vinod Kumar Dwivedi
Law laid down - Labour/Service Law - The respondent/workman was dismissed from service on the ground that he was party to illegal release of pension of a widow to an incompetent person. The Industrial Tribunal opined that workman was a private driver of a Bank Manager till 2009. Thereafter, he became Peon in the Bank and not responsible for sanction or release of pension. The Clerical Staff and officers who were responsible for sanction and release of pension were inflicted with Full Judgment
BEYOND MALLS LLP vs. LIFESTYLE INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANOTHER.
IMRAN MEMAN Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Law laid down - Loose chilli seeds found in the godown of petitioner along with packaging machines and packets. Petitioner had license to deal in chilli seeds in the name of Synergy Seeds. Police seized the seeds and packaging material and filed charge sheet for not having license for packaging the chilli seeds and for committing offence under Sections 420, 467, 469 and 475 of IPC. and Sections 7(1)(A)(II) and 7(2) of Essential Commodities Act, 1955. Petitioner filed application under Section Full Judgment
Devendra Kumar Soni Versus State of M.P & others
Vikas versus State Of Madhya Pradesh
Bail cannot be claimed by a juvenile as a matter of right - If the juvenile committed a heinous crime and if his release on bail defeats the ‘ends of justice’; also shakes the conscience of the society and virtually it is a threat to the society too then the bail to a juvenile can be denied by the Court. Full Judgment
SHRI ASHOK LALWANI Versus THE STATE OF M.P
Law laid down – 1. According to Rule 22 of Chapter IV of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Rules, 2008 Hon'ble the Chief Justice, who is the Master of the roster has a power to direct to list any case before any Bench of this Court. 2. Advocate of the petitioner of any petition is not aggrieved party so he has no locus standi to file a Writ Petition in person for seeking direction regarding listing of that petition. Full Judgment
Arun Kumar Mehta Vs. State of MP
In terms of the M.P. State Urban Engineering Service (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2015, for posting the Executive Engineer of the Department of Urban Administration and Environment on the deputation post of Executive Engineer/Superintending Engineer in the Municipal Corporation provided in Schedule I of the Rules, the consent is implicit and no separate consent is required. Full Judgment
Mahesh Prasad Dixit vs. State of MP
Mr. Akshay N. Patel Versus Reserve Bank of India and Another
Ban of export in respect of KN95 Masks, Personal Protective Equipment Kits and other products does not amount to violation of fundamental right guaranteed under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India. Its a purely policy matter and the Government of India does have the power to frame Trade Policy in exercise of powers conferred under the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992. The Circular issued by Reserve Bank of India dated 23/01/2020 in respect of Merchanting Trade Transactions is Full Judgment
Smt. Sunita Gandharva Versus State of M.P. & Anr.
Surendra Kumar Jain vs. State of M.P. & Ors.
RAM AVATAR GAUR AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS
Vipin Dhanaitkar Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & Others
Law laid down - 1. The dispute, as to whether a particular property was or was not recognized as private property of the Ruler, is itself a dispute arising out of the terms of the Covenant, and therefore, not adjudicable in light of Article 363 of the Constitution of India. 2. The Khasgi (Devi Ahilya Bai Holkar Charities) Trust, Indore does not have title of the Trust properties, as keeping in view the covenant signed by the erstwhile Ruler of Holkar State Full Judgment
State of Madhya Pradesh & Others Versus Khasgi (Devi Ahilya Bai Holkar Charities) Trust, Indore & Others
Law laid down – 1. The dispute, as to whether a particular property was or was not recognized as private property of the Ruler, is itself a dispute arising out of the terms of the Covenant, and therefore, not adjudicable in light of Article 363 of the Constitution of India. 2. The Khasgi (Devi Ahilya Bai Holkar Charities) Trust, Indore does not have title of the Trust properties, as keeping in view the covenant signed by the erstwhile Ruler of Holkar State Full Judgment