Judgments - Madhya Pradesh High Court
Jhabbu & Ors. vs. State of MP
Gabbar @ Gopal s/o Devpuri Gusai Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Chandresh Shukla Vs. The Registrar, People’s University
Law laid down - The order should clearly reflect the reasons thereof, subsequent explanation or reasons justifying the impugned order not permissible. (See para-10) Recording of reasons for terminating the services in the impugned order is necessary, as the reasons are the heartbeat of any order. Non-speaking orders do not stand judicial scrutiny. (See para-9) Full Judgment
Rajesh Kumar Rathore vs. High Court of M.P. and another
Law laid down - Held:- when the services of a temporary employee or a probationer or contingency paid employee is brought to an end by passing innocuous order due to unsatisfactory nature of service or on account of an act for which some action is taken, but the termination is made in a simplicitor manner without conducting of inquiry or without casting any stigma on the employee, the provisions of Rule 9 of the Rules 1980 can be taken aid of. However, Full Judgment
Chandra Prakash @ Tinku Pandey Vs. The State of M.P. & Others.
Chief General Manager, S.E.C.L vs. Chandramani Tiwari
Kewal Kumar Jaggi & others Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & others
Bombay Intelligence Security (India) Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and others
Mrs. Prachi Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law laid down - 1. Very cogent and overwhelming circumstances are necessary for an order directing cancellation of the bail, already granted. 2. The concept of setting aside the unjustified, illegal or perverse order is totally different from the concept of cancelling the bail on the ground that accused has misconducted himself or because of some new facts requiring such cancellation. 3. Applicant should first move the Court concerned for cancellation of bail bringing out the circumstances as have been mentioned in Annexure Full Judgment
Ved Prakash Sharma Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh & ors
Law laid down - Inherent power is of wide plenitude with no statutory limitation but it has to be exercised in accordance with the guidelines engrafted in such power namely; (i) to secure the ends of justice or (ii) to prevent abuse of the process of any Court. In those cases power to quash the criminal proceedings or complaint or F.I.R may be exercised where the offender and victim have settled their dispute would depend on the facts and circumstances of Full Judgment
Haliman Bee vs. Joya Khan & others.
Law Laid Down - When there is alternative remedy under Section 388(3) of the Indian Succession Act read with Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Misc. petition under Section 227 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable and only a civil revision lies. Full Judgment
Smt. Pooja Soni Versus Dinesh Kumar and others
Rakesh Kushwaha Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Manoj Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Dr. (Smt.) Amita Gupta Vs. State of M.P. & Anr.
Law laid down - Section 10A & 11 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 and Medical Council of India, Minimum Qualifications for Teachers in Medical Institutions Regulations, 1998 – Scope – The provision relating to “establishment” of medical college and recognition of a course” are two distinct and different provisions which are dealt with by different statutory provisions and method. Section 11(2) r/w Notification and corrigendum – A conjoint reading of Section 11(2), original Notification of 1.4.2019 and corrigendum leaves no Full Judgment
Smt. Munni Bai Vs. State of MP and ors.
Sitaram Vs. State of M.P.
Vatash Sharma Vs. Indore Development Authority & another
Law laid down - 1. Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973 - Madhya Pradesh Vikas Pradhikarano Ki Sampatiyon Ka Prabandhan Tatha Vyayan Niyam, 2018 - Vyayan Niyam prescribes the method for disposal of the property of Development Authority. The IDA issued NIT for third and fourth time respectively. After cancelling the bid of petitioners, the new NIT was issued based on the fact that after end of Corona curfew, the market value of shops is enormously enhanced. This is not the factor Full Judgment