Judgments - Madhya Pradesh High Court
M/s Zigitza Health Care Ltd. Versus Naresh Kumar Verma & Ors.
Dr. Hitendra Singh Yadav Versus The State of M.P.
Law Laid down :- M. P. Civil Services( Leave Rules) 1977 Rule 32 - The petitioner was a probationer and was not holding the post substantively. Even otherwise, if a probationer has rendered less than 5 years service, the competent authority was well within its power to decline study leave. Rule 42 of Leave Rules - As per sub rule 4 clause(ii), the petitioner’s prayer for study leave was rightly declined because he admittedly remained under suspension from 2014-2021 and did not render Full Judgment
Deepak Kalosia and another Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Brilliant Institute Of Professional Studies Niwari Vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - The University which is set up under the provisions of M.P. Vishwavidyalaya Adhiniyam, 1973, is not legally empowered to prescribe any affiliation fees of the Colleges which is not approved by the Coordination Committee. The power of the Vice-Chancellor of the University under Section 15(4) of the Act of 1973, does not include the power to amend Statute No.27, which is approved by the Coordination Committee and the same can be amended by the Coordination Committee alone. Full Judgment
Laghu Udhyog Nirmata Avam Vikreta Sangh Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh
Special Police Establishment vs. Umesh Tiwari and another
Law laid down - 1. An accused cannot invoke Section 91 Cr.P.C. during pendency of investigation. 2. However, an accused can invoke Section 91 on and after the filing of charge-sheet. 3. Section 91 can also be invoked by the other stakeholders i.e. victim and also prosecution. 4. Court can also invoke Section 91 Cr.P.C. suo moto. 5. All the above invocation by any stakeholder is subject to satisfaction of the Court about desirability and necessity of the document sought to be produced. Full Judgment
Shiv Singh and Ors. Vs. State of MP and Anr.
Balli Chaudhary alias Rakesh Vs. State of MP
Gurupreet Singh Vs. State of MP and Anr.
Sanjay Kumar Vs. Jitendra
Law Laid Down - Defence of defendant is not to be considered while deciding application under Section 13(6) of M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961. Only pleadings in plaint is to be considered by the Court. Court is only required to see that suit has been instituted on grounds mentioned in Section 12(1) of M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 and whether defendant has complied with condition enumerated in Section 13(1) of the Act of 1961 or not. On failure of defendant to Full Judgment
M/S Pm Projects And Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Micro And Small Enterprised Facilitation Council
Govind Sharma Vs. Hight Court Of Madhya Pradesh
Smt. Geetarani Tiwari Vs. Yogesh Tiwari
Dr. Vijendra Dhanware & Another Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law laid down - Admission Rules – Definition of ‘in-service candidates’ also includes the Medical Officers working in District Hospital whether or not such Hospital is situated in difficult, remote or rural area. Thus, they are entitled to be considered as special entry under 30%. MCI Regulations – Regulation 9(8). This regulation is applicable to Diploma Course and not to Degree or Post Graduate Degree Course. No provision was brought to the notice of the Court to show that posting at remote, Full Judgment
J.B.S. Chandel Vs. State of M.P.
Law laid down - The object of giving protection under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure-- To take sanction for initiating prosecution against public servant for protecting them from needless harassment so as to render protective assurance to honest officer to perform public duty honestly and to best of their abilities because threat of prosecution demoralises the honest officer. Real test to determine applicability of Section 197 of Cr.C.P. and obtaining sanction from the Government are:- (i) That the accused must be a Full Judgment
State of M.P. and others Vs. Ku. Preeti Patidar and others
Law laid down - S.89 and 92 of M.P. Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993: An amount cannot be directly recovered under Section 92 of the M.P. Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam unless the same is determined under Section 89 of the same. This is for the reason that without determining the amount, if the notice under Section 92 is served on a person, the amount cannot be said to be due on the date of its recovery because Full Judgment
Saurabh & another Versus State of M.P. & Ors
Law laid down - M.P.Public Trusts Act, 1951. 1. The question which is posed in the present petition is that whether the Registrar Public Trust can pass an order of such a nature removing two trustees and directing the trust to conduct the election by appointing two new trustees. (Para-9). 2. A perusal of the provisions i.e. S.22,25 & 26 of the Act, it clearly reveal that if the vacancies have occurred in the Board, it can be filled through the procedure as Full Judgment
M/s. Rajpal Construction Co. Vs. The State of M.P. and Ors.
Law laid down - Held:- 1. The jurisdiction of the High Court under section 19 of the Act of 1983 is limited to the grounds mentioned in Section 19(2) of the Act of 1983. 2. In absence of production of the works contract before the Tribunal, it cannot be decided whether, the parties had obligation to approach the final authority under the works contract. Full Judgment
Jayesh Gurnani s/o Mr. Ravi Gurnani & another v. Madhya Pradesh State Election Commission & others
Law laid down - 1. The sole issue which falls for consideration of this Court is whether the gazette publication regarding reservation of Municipal wards, issued by the State Government on 06.11.2020, meets the constitutional validity, as provided under Article 243-T of the Constitution of India. (Para 23) Held: Considering the provisions of the Act and the Rules in the light of the constitutional provision i.e. Article 243-T, it is found that the provision of rotation of different seats is indeed provided Full Judgment