Judgments - Chhatisgarh High Court
XYZ Versus State of Chhattisgarh
Rape victim is entitled for compensation under Section 357A of the CrPC read with Section 33(8) of the POCSO Act. Full Judgment
Ayush Medical Association Versus State of Chhattisgarh
Opportunity when denied in employment, has to pass the reasonablity and fair decision making process. Full Judgment
South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Versus State of Chhattisgarh
The Municipal Corporation or the Municipal Council may have legislative functions, but these local bodies cannot undermine or supersede the Rules framed exercising the statutory legislative functions by the State Government by way of administrative instructions, orders or resolutions. Full Judgment
Rajkumar Sahu Versus State of Chhattisgarh
Approver who has been granted pardon under Section 306(1) of the CrPC can be released on bail in exercise of inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the CrPC Full Judgment
The State of Chhattisgarh Versus Rikki Sahu and Ors
Cognizance of the offence under Section 188 of the IPC cannot be taken on the basis of police report. Full Judgment
Asha Ram Suryavanshi Versus Chhattisgarh Gramin Bank
There is a clear distinction between the term "Resignation" and "Voluntary Retirement". The reasons in the application for voluntary retirement cannot be construed by the management of it being an application for resignation from service. The management/employer cannot give its own interpretation to an application for voluntary retirement by treating to be an application for resignation. The consequence and effect of the two terminology i.e. "Resignation" and "Voluntary Retirement" are entirely different and it has far-reaching effects also. Full Judgment
Tamboli Versus Director Agriculture, Department of Vindhyachal Bhavan, Bhopal, Chhattisgarh
The enquiry officer is required to give finding on evidence on the basis of which the charges were levelled and proved. The enquiry officer is a quasi judicial authority and is not supposed to be a representative of the department/disciplinary authority/Government. Full Judgment
Shambhu Prasad Sharma Advocate Versus Dr. Renu Jogi, W/o Shri Ajit Pramod Kumar Jogi
Election of each of the returned candidates has to be challenged by filing of a separate election petition. Full Judgment
Gram Panchayat Jaimura Versus Nirnidhi, w/o Shri Ram Patel
The plaintiff cannot claim adverse possession on a Government land reserved for public utility such as road/hospital. लोकोपयोगिता हेतु आरक्षित शासकीय भूमि जैसे सड़क/अस्पताल पर वादी प्रतिकूल कब्जे का दावा नहीं कर सकता है। Full Judgment
Ambika Mission Boys Middle School, Ambikapur Versus State of Chhattisgarh
(i) The State would be employer within the definition of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 for the teachers/employees of aided educational institutions. (ii) There Cannot be unjustified classification between the two classes of teachers/employees for payment of gratuity before or after the cut-off date i.e., 01.04.2013, for whom, grant-in-aid is received by Institutions. Full Judgment
Food Corporation of India Versus State of Chhattisgarh
FCI being a body corporate is legal entity. It has neither living mind nor voice. So it can only act through resolution to transfer a land. Full Judgment
Irfan Qureashi Versus Chhattisgarh State Public Service Commission
Chhattisgarh Aviation Academy Versus Punjab National Bank
SARFESI ACT 2002 * The said act shall not apply to creation of any security in any aircraft. * Non-compliance of the statutory compliance as required under Section 3-A of the Act and 3-A of the Rules will vitiate all subsequent proceedings. Full Judgment
Smt.Kiran Devi Agrawal Versus State of Chhattisgarh
To ascertain whether for the vast land, the possession of the land is taken or not, a pragmatic approach has to be adopted and conduct of the parties would be relevant. Full Judgment
Pannalal Swarnkar Versus Rajkumar Soni (Rajkumar Tailors)
1. Omnibus statement of fraud on WILL, will not be sufficient in absence of specific particular as required under Order 6 Rule 4 of C.P.C. 2. Court would not return a finding of proof of WILL on assumed suspicion or supposition. Full Judgment
In Reference State Of Chhattisgarh Versus Ram Sona
Death sentence awarded to accused for committing rape and murder of 5½ years old girl is confirmed. In view of Section 30 of the Evidence Act, self inculpatory memorandum statement of co-accused can be read in evidence if there are other corroborative evidence against the accused. Full Judgment
Kundan Singh Thakur Versus Union Of India
CBI Investigation directed for alleged misappropriation and siphoning of more than Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand Crores) in State Resource Centre (SRC) and the Physical Referral Rehabilitation Centre (for brevity 'the PRRC') of the State Government for the last about 10 years. Full Judgment
Dhananjay Kumar Versus State Of Chhattisgarh
Prospective accused has no right of hearing before registration of FIR and investigation by the police officer or before the Court including the writ Court, therefore, in a writ petition seeking direction for registration of FIR and investigation into a cognizable offence, the prospective accused is neither necessary nor a proper party. Full Judgment
Dhanush Singh Netam Versus State of Chhattisgarh
While deciding the representation against the transfer of employees/officers, the grounds raised therein are required to be considered. Full Judgment
Goutam Buddha Agrawal Versus Satyanarayan Sharma
To maintain an election petition, petitioner should be either an elector or valid candidate under the Representation of Peoples Act, 1951. Full Judgment