Judgments - SUPREME COURT APPEAL
C.C.E. MUMBAI - IV Vs. M/S. FITRITE PACKERS, MUMBAI
M/S STAR INDUSTRIES Vs. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(IMPORTS) RAIGAD
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND C.E.NAGPUR Vs. M/S. ISPAT INDUSTRIES LTD.
STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Vs. NORTHERN INDIAN GLASS INDUSTRIES LTD.
RAMESH CHAND DEAD THROUGH LRS. Vs. ASRUDDIN(DEAD) THR LRS. & ANR.
JAGDISH LAL GAMBHIR Vs. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ORS.
NEON LABORATORIES LTD. Vs. MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES LTD. & ORS
PURNIMA MANTHENA & ANR. Vs. DR. RENUKA DATLA & ORS.
M/S. LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. ECC CONST.GRP. Vs. C.C.E, HYDERABAD
VIJAY KUMAR AGARWAL Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
When the order of suspension is revoked and the suspended employee is asked to join the duty, he is required to do so. How the period of suspension is to be treated is another aspect. At the most, such an employee would be entitled to full salary during the suspension period if no order is passed as to how the suspension period would be governed. That would not Full Judgment
PUKHREM SHARATCHANDRA SINGH Vs. MAIREMBAM PRITHVIRAJ @ PRITHIBIRAJ SINGH
STATE BANK OF HYDERABAD Vs. RABO BANK
RAM KUMAR & ORS. Vs. ABHINANDAN KUMAR TADAIYA (D) TH:LRS.&ORS
RAJINDER KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ANR
But the question is, whether dismissal is the only option in such situations where an employee is found unfit for service. We have no doubt in our mind that indiscipline of any sort cannot be tolerated at all in a disciplined force. However, in the factual background of the appellant which we have referred to above, the disciplinary authority or at least the appellate authority, should have considered whether a punishment other than dismissal would have been Full Judgment