Judgments - SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA Vs. C. L. VIMALA & ORS.
it is the prerogative of the Creditor alone whether he would move against the principal debtor first or the surety, to realize the loan amount. “Therefore, the creditor has a right to obtain a decree against the surety and the principal debtor. The surety has no right to restrain execution of the decree against him until the creditor has exhausted his remedy against the principal debtor Full Judgment
M.P. STEEL CORPORATION Vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9799 OF 2010 N
VINOD KUMAR SUBBIAH Vs. SARASWATHI PALANIAPPAN
FATEHJI & COMPANY & ANR Vs. L.M. NAGPAL & ORS
COMMNR.,CUSTOMS & CENT.EXCISE AURANGABAD Vs. M/S. ROOFIT INDUSTRIES LTD.
M.P. STEEL CORPORATION Vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE
K.DEVAKIMMA AND ORS. Vs. TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS AND ANR.
NIRLON LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI
ONGC LTD. Vs. PETROLEUM COAL LABOUR UNION & ORS
H. LAKSHMAIAH REDDY & ORS. Vs. L. VENKATESH REDDY
GAURI SHANKER Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Whether the Labour Court was justified in not awarding backwages and granting Rs.2,500/- as compensation in lieu of backwages though it has awarded reinstatement in the absence of gainful employment of workman? Whether the High Court in exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227, is justified in interfering with the finding of facts recorded on the points of dispute recorded by the Labour Full Judgment
WIPRO LTD. Vs. ASST. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS & ORS.
2) The subject matter of those writ petitions/writ appeals was the constitutional validity of proviso (II-i) of Rule 9(2) of the Customs Valuation (Determination of Price of Imported Goods) Rules, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the "Valuation Rules"). 36) We are, therefore, of the opinion that impugned amendment, namely, proviso Full Judgment
ASHAPURA MINE-CHEM LTD Vs. GUJARAT MINERAL DEVLOPMENT CORPORATION
In the light of our above conclusion, we hold that the learned Judge having failed to appreciate the legal position as regards the existence of an arbitration agreement in the MoU irrespective of the failure of the parties to reach a full-fledged agreement with respect to the various terms and conditions contained in the MoU for a joint venture, the said conclusion and judgment of the learned Full Judgment