Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 6651-6653
of 2015, Judgment Date: Aug 28, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 6631-6632
of 2015, Judgment Date: Aug 27, 2015
The concept of ‘catch-up rule’ and ‘consequential seniority’ is
judicially evolved concepts to control the extent of reservation. The
question of reservation and the associated promotion and the consequential
seniority have been the matter of discussion in various decisions of this
Court. The matter regarding reservation in promotions was considered by a
nine Judge Bench of this Court in Indra Sawhney And Ors. vs. Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 6595
of 2015, Judgment Date: Aug 26, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 6583
of 2015, Judgment Date: Aug 26, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 6673
of 2014, Judgment Date: Aug 25, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 1941
of 2006, Judgment Date: Aug 25, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 1959
of 2006, Judgment Date: Aug 25, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 629-630
of 2006, Judgment Date: Aug 25, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 2089
of 2015, Judgment Date: Aug 25, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 2866
of 2006, Judgment Date: Aug 25, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 375
of 2006, Judgment Date: Aug 24, 2015
We also find no merit in other submission advanced on behalf of the
appellants that there is legal impediment in charging levy on the cost of
construction incurred by the employer from a particular period on account
of constitution of Board from a particular date or for any other reason.
This argument is fallacious. Such beneficial measures for the welfare of
workers are applicable even to Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 6553
of 2015, Judgment Date: Aug 24, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 860
of 2006, Judgment Date: Aug 21, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 2246
of 2006, Judgment Date: Aug 21, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 3580
of 2005, Judgment Date: Aug 21, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India
Appeal (Civil), 6532
of 2015, Judgment Date: Aug 21, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 1834
of 2006, Judgment Date: Aug 21, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4027
of 2009, Judgment Date: Aug 21, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 6465
of 2015, Judgment Date: Aug 20, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 6770
of 2004, Judgment Date: Aug 20, 2015
Full Judgment
