Judgments - SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE
VATSALA SHENOY Vs. JT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
LANCO ANPARA POWER LTD. Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS
VIKAS SANKHALA & ORS ETC Vs. VIKAS KUMAR AGARWAL & ORS ETC
THE ELECTRICITY DEPARTMENT, REP. BY ITS SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PORT BLAIR AND Vs. M/S SURYACHAKRA POWER CORPORATION LTD AND ANR
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. DEVESH CHHABRA AND ORS
HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LTD. Vs. STATE OF U.P AND ORS
SUNHERI AND ORS. Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR
SUKHWANT KAUR AND ORS. Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. USHA DEVI AND ORS.
TIN PLATE DEALERS ASSN. P. LTD. & ORS. Vs. SATISH CHANDRA SANWALKA & ORS
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Vs. M/S MEGHMANI ORGANICS LTD.& ORS
ASIKALI AKBARALI GILANI ETC Vs. NASIRHUSAIN MAHEBUBBHAI CHAUHAN & ORS
THE MADURAI CORPORATION Vs. P. KAYALVIZHI & ANR
ANIL HOBLE Vs. KASHINATH JAIRAM SHETYE AND ORS
NARENDRA Vs. K.MEENA
Fortunately for the Appellant, because of the noise and disturbance, even the neighbours of the Appellant rushed to help and the door of the bathroom was broken open and the Respondent was saved. Had she been successful in her attempt to commit suicide, then one can foresee the consequences and the plight of the Appellant because in that event the Appellant would have Full Judgment
M/S DUGAR TEA INDUSTRIES PVT.LTD. Vs. STATE OF ASSAM & ORS
HIRAL P. HARSORA AND ORS. Vs. KUSUM NAROTTAMDAS HARSORA AND ORS
GOV.BODY,L.P SHAHI COLLEGE, PATNA & ANR Vs. SEEMA MISHRA AND ORS
ANURAG KUMAR SINGH & ORS. Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.
It is significant that the Rules refer to the recruitment year. It is a well-accepted principle of service law that only the number of vacancies that are advertised can be filled up. If the advertisement gives liberty to the Government to vary the number of posts, such power cannot be exercised for filling up future vacancies. If additional posts were created during the recruitment year i.e. Full Judgment