Judgments - APPLICATION U/s 482

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

MAHILA RAMKALI DEVI AND ORS. Vs. NANDRAM THR. LRS.& ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 2366 of 2010, Judgment Date: May 14, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S DHARAMPAL SATYAPAL LTD. Vs. DY.COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.& ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 4458-4459 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 14, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

JOSHI TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL INC Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 6929 of 2012, Judgment Date: May 14, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S. TATA CHEMICALS LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS(PREVENTIVE)JAMNAGAR

Appeal (Civil), 7439-7440 of 2004, Judgment Date: May 14, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

DIR. GEN. OF INC.TAX(INV) PUNE & ORS. Vs. M/S. SPACEWOOD FUNISHERS PVT. LTD. & ORS

Appeal (Civil), 4394 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 13, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

DEVI MULTIPLEX & ANR. Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 6478 of 2009, Judgment Date: May 13, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

RAJ KUMAR DIXIT Vs. M/S. VIJAY KUMAR GAURI SHANKER, KANPUR NAGAR

Appeal (Civil), 4370 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 12, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

HC PRADEEP KUMAR RAI & ORS. Vs. DINESH KUMAR PANDEY & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 6549 of 2014, Judgment Date: May 11, 2015

Tags Appointment Regularisation Promotion Service Law / Matter , Provident Funds

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

THE CHAIRMAN & MNG.DIR., TNHB & ANR. Vs. S. SARASWATHY & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 736-737 of 2008, Judgment Date: May 11, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Vs. HANUMAN INDUSTRIES & ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 3962 of 2011, Judgment Date: May 08, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S. SERVO-MED INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI

Appeal (Civil), 583 of 2005, Judgment Date: May 07, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

KHENYEI Vs. NEW INDIA ASSURNACE CO.LTD.& ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 4244 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 07, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, KERALA Vs. M/S. TRAVANCORE SUGARS & CHEMICALS LTD.

Appeal (Civil), 2558 of 2005, Judgment Date: May 07, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. Vs. CALCUTTA MINERAL SUPPLY CO.P.LTD. & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 2548 of 2006, Judgment Date: May 06, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

ZONAL.GEN.MANAGER,IRCON INTER.NATNL.LTD. Vs. M/S VINAY HEAVY EQUIPMENTS

Appeal (Civil), 7205 of 2006, Judgment Date: May 06, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S. B.P.L. LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CALICUT

Appeal (Civil), 5523 of 2004, Judgment Date: May 05, 2015

NON-REPORTABLE Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S. COAL HANDLERS PVT. LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KOLKATA

Appeal (Civil), 7215 of 2004, Judgment Date: May 05, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S. SECURE METERS LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS, NEW DELHI

Appeal (Civil), 7526 of 2004, Judgment Date: May 05, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

K.RADHIKA Vs. T.RAJYA LAXMI & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 4201 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 05, 2015

It consists of innumerable errors. We only hope that it is not the desire of the High Court that such candidates are required to be appointed merely because they have the higher grade qualification. We, therefore, allow the appeal and set aside the judgment under appeal. Full Judgment

Tags Appointment Service Law / Matter , Provident Funds Qualification

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD Vs. NEW PINK CITY NIRMAN SAHKA.SAM.LD.& ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 1527-1536 of 2013, Judgment Date: May 01, 2015

Constructive notice in legal fiction signifies that the individual person should know as a reasonable person would have. Even if they have no actual knowledge of it. Constructive notice means a man ought to have known a fact. A person is said to have notice of a fact when he actually knows a fact but for Full Judgment

Tags Award Compensation Conduct Of Business Of Govt Of India Or State Land Acquisition Business Allocation Rules