Judgments - APPLICATION U/s 482
NK RAJENDRA MOHAN Vs. THIRVAMADI RUBBER CO. LTD AND ORS
OIL & NATURAL GAS CORP. LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX & ANR.
UNION OF INDIA Vs. M/S BRIGHT POWER PROJECTS(I) P.LTD.
When parties to the contract had agreed to the fact that interest would not be awarded on the amount payable to the contractor under the contract, in our opinion, they were bound by their understanding. Having once agreed that the contractor would not claim Full Judgment
M/S.ESSAR OIL LTD. Vs. HINDUSTAN SHIPYARD LTD. & ORS.
V. KRISHNAKUMAR Vs. STATE OF TAMIL NADU &ORS.
An application of this principle is that the aggrieved person should get that sum of money, which would put him in the same position if he had not sustained the wrong. It must necessarily result in compensating the aggrieved person for the financial loss suffered due to the event, the pain and suffering undergone and the liability that he/she would have to incur due to Full Judgment
OIL & NATURAL GAS CORP. LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX & ANR.
DEPOSIT INSURANCE & CREDIT GUARNT.CORPN. Vs. RAGUPATHI RAGAVAN & ORS.
INDIAN PERFORMING RIGHTS SOCIETY LTD. Vs. SANJAY DALIA & ANR
OIL & NATURAL GAS CORP. LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX & ANR.
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & ANR. Vs. PANNALAL CHOUDHURY & ANR.
QUANTUM SECURITIES PVT LTD AND ORS Vs. NEW DELHI TELEVISION LTD
COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI Vs. M/S. SANDAN VIKAS (I) LTD.
STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. Vs. MAHENDRA NATH SHARMA
20. The antiquated notion of pension being a bounty a gratuitous payment depending upon the sweet will or grace of the employer not claimable as a right and, therefore, no right to pension can be enforced through court has been swept under the carpet by the decision of Full Judgment
RAHUL YADAV & ANR. Vs. M/S. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. & ORS.
PETROLEUM & NATURAL GAS REGUL.BOARD Vs. INDRAPRASTHA GAS LTD.& ORS.
AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. ETC. Vs. RAJUBHAI SOMABHAI BHARWAD & ANR. ETC.
STATE OF KERALA & ORS Vs. A.P MAMMIKUTTY
A.P. STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD. Vs. MATETI S.V.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
PREM RAM Vs. M.D. UTTARAKHAND PEY JAL & NIRM.NIGM&ORS
If engagement in a work- charged establishment rest on a criterion, no better than the absolute discretion of the authority engaging them or the fortuitous circumstances of a vacancy or need in a work-charged establishment, then, there is indeed no difference between a daily-wager on the one hand and work-charged employees on the other. No distinction can resultantly be Full Judgment
CANARA BANK & ANR. Vs. M. MAHESH KUMAR
Common question of law falling for consideration in these civil appeals is whether the dependant family members of the deceased employee of the appellant-Canara Bank were entitled to seek compassionate appointment on the basis of ‘Dying in Harness Scheme’ which was passed Vide Circular No.154/1993 w.e.f. 8.05.1993. (i) Compassionate employment cannot be made in the absence of rules or regulations issued by the Government or a public authority. The request Full Judgment