Judgments - APPLICATION U/s 482
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
HARIHAR PRASAD PADARHA Vs. M/S KANHA WILDERNESS LTD.,
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
STANTECH PROJECT ENGG. PVT. LTD. Vs. NICCO CORPORATION LTD.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
VEDICA PROCON PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. BALLESHWAR GREENS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
GIRISHCHANDRA MANUBHAI PATEL Vs. VEDICA PROCON PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
Tags Company Law
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ANR. Vs. TVL. SOUTH INDIAN SUGAR MILLS ASSN.&ORS
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
KALYAN CHEMICALS Vs. GOVERNMENT OF A.P. & ORS.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
M/S K.C.P. LTD. Vs. GOVT. OF A.P. & ORS.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
D.R. ENTERPRISES LTD. Vs. ASSTT. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND ORS
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
K.K.GOHIL Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
S.M. ASIF Vs. VIRENDRA KUMAR BAJAJ
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
M.C.D. & ANR. Vs. M/S. MEHRASONS JEWELLERS (P) LTD.
Supreme Court of India
M/S FIBRE BOARDS (P) LTD BANGALOARE Vs. CIT BANGALORE.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
M/S TECH INVEST INDIA PVT. LTD. THROUGH MAJOR SHAREHOLDER RAJIV GOSAIN Vs. ASSAM POWER AND ELECTRICALS LTD & ORS.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
CHIEF CONTROLLING REVENUE AUTHORITY Vs. COSTAL GUJARAT POWER LTD. & ORS.
Tags Interpretation
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
CHIEF CONTROLLING REVENUE AUTHORITY Vs. COSTAL GUJARAT POWER LTD. & ORS.
Tags Interpretation
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
M/S TECH INVEST INDIA PVT. LTD. THROUGH MAJOR SHAREHOLDER RAJIV GOSAIN Vs. ASSAM POWER AND ELECTRICALS LTD & ORS.
Tags Company Law
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
A.N. SACHDEVA (DEAD) BY LRS. & ORS. Vs. MAHARSHI DAYANAND UNIVERSITY,ROHTAK &ANR
Considering the principles enunciated under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, and that the benefit is not an ex gratia payment but a payment in recognition of past service, in our opinion, discrimination could not have been made between those employees who have been absorbed/allocated are entitled to count their services as qualifying service for the purpose of pension and not those who have been appointed directly. Fact remains that all these employees have served in Punjab University/Kurukshetra University/MD. University without any break. M.D. University, prior to Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
FAIRGROWTH FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. Vs. CUSTODIAN & ANR.
Tags Tenancy
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
LAXMI FIBRES LTD. Vs. A.P. INDUSTRIAL DEV. CORPN. LTD. & ORS.
Tags Competition Laws