Judgments - APPLICATION U/s 482
COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER Vs. A INFRASTRUCTURE LTD
SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA Vs. ICAP INDIA PVT. LTD.
BRIJ BIHARI SINGH Vs. BIHAR STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION & ORS.(R-1,4,7)
It is well settled that a person who is required to answer a charge imposed should know not only the accusation but also the testimony by which the accusation is supported. The delinquent must be given fair chance to hear the evidence in support of the charge and to cross-examine the witnesses who prove the charge. The delinquent must also be given a chance to Full Judgment
ELEKTRON LIGHTING SYSTEMS PVT LTD AND ANR Vs. SHAH INVESTMENTS FINANCIALS DEVELOPMENTS AND CONSULTANTS PVT LTD AND ORS ETC.
M/S. STATE BANK OF PATIALA TR.GEN.MANAGER Vs. COMMR.OF INCOME TAX,PATIALA
B. RADHAKRISHNAN Vs. THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.
PAWAN KUMAR AGARWALA Vs. GENERAL MANAGER-II AND APPOINTING AUTHORITY AND ORS.
VISHWANATH DADU GURAV (D) TH. LRS & ORS Vs. DATTATRAY GANAPATI GURAV
PARVAIZ AHMAD PARRY Vs. STATE OF JAMMU& KASHMIR AND ORS
In our view, if a candidate has done B.Sc. in Forestry as one of the major subjects and has also done Masters in the Forestry, i.e., M.Sc.(Forestry) then in the absence of any clarification on such issue, the candidate possessing such higher qualification has to be held to possess the required qualification to apply for the post. Full Judgment
M/S COCHIN SHIPYARD LTD Vs. M/S APEEJAY SHIPPING LTD
Misconduct, as has been laid down, does not always have a moral connotation. To elaborate, it may not have any connection with the individual/personal conduct of the arbitrator. The said conduct would be in sphere of moral misconduct. As far as legal misconduct is concerned, as the authorities would demonstrate, the same must be manifest or palpable from the proceedings before the arbitrator. To Full Judgment