Judgments - APPLICATION U/s 378
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS ETC ETC Vs. HEMANT RAI ETC ETC
JSW INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED AND ANR. Vs. KAKINADA SEAPORTS LIMITED AND ORS.
M/S RASIKLAL KANTILAL & CO. Vs. BOARD OF TRUSTEE OF PORT OF BOMBAY & ORS
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, NANGAL AND ORS. Vs. ARUNA SAINI
SWAMI SHIVSHANKARGIRI CHELLA SWAMI& ANR Vs. SATYA GYAN NIKETAN & ANR.
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS. Vs. SHAIK MAHIBULLA SHARIEF
EX. GNR LAXMANRAM POONIA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
SATISH KUMAR GUPTA AND ETC. ETC. Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ETC.
MANUARA KHATUN & ORS. Vs. RAJESH KR. SINGH & ORS.
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON LONDON BRANCH Vs. ZENITH INFOTECH LIMITED
PRABHAKARA ADIGA Vs. GOWRI AND ORS
Singular question involved in the matter is executability of decree for permanent injunction against the legal representatives of judgment- debtor. It is crystal clear from a perusal of section 50(2) CPC that a decree for permanent injunction can be executed against the judgment debtor or his legal representatives. Normally personal action dies with person but this principle has application to limited kinds of causes of actions. In our considered opinion the Full Judgment
BHIKAN SK.NOOR MOHD Vs. MEHAMOODABEE SK.AFZAL & ORS.
JAYANTILAL CHIMANLAL PATEL Vs. VADILAL PURSHOTTAMDAS PATEL
MEHMOODA GULSHAN Vs. JAVAID HUSSAIN MUNGLOO
Whether the requirement of the landlord for own occupation could also mean occupation by a member of the family, in this case, the son, is the short question arising for consideration. The premises sought to be evicted is not held for the benefit of the son alone; but the whole family. It is for the own occupation of the landlord. It has been established in the facts of this case that the landlord was not happy and Full Judgment