Judgments - APPLICATION U/s 378 DEFECTIVE
SIRAJMOHMEDKHAN JANMOHAMADKHAN VS. HAFIZUNNISA YASINKHAN & ANR.
LILA GUPTA Vs LAXMI NARAIN & ORS
HELD : (1) Examining the matter from all possible angles and keeping in view the fact that the scheme of the Act provides for, treating certain marriages void and simultaneously some marriages which are made punishable yet not void and no consequences having been provided for in respect of the marriage in contravention of the proviso to s. 15 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 it cannot be said that such marriage would be void. In the instant case, as the Full Judgment
State Of West Bengal Etc vs Manmal Bhutoria & Ors. Etc
HEADNOTE: In May 1967 a case was lodged against the respondent and a Major of the Indian Army who was retired in 1966, alleging that the Major, along with the respondent, had committed offences of conspiracy of criminal misconduct by a public servant in dishonestly abusing his position as a public servant, under s. 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. When the case, which was allotted to the Fourth Additional Special Court under s. 4(.2) of the West Bengal Full Judgment
ASHOK DULICHAND VS. MADAHAVLAL DUBE & ANOTHER
NARAYAN GANESH DASTANE VS. SUCHETA NARAYAN DASTANE
ROSY JACOB Vs.JACOB A. CHAKRAMAKKAL
ROHINI KUMARI VS. NARENDRA SINGH
KULBHUSHAN KUMAR VS. RAJ KUMARI & ANR.
MATHURA PRASAD BAJOO JAISWAL & ORS. Vs. DOSSIBAI N. B. JEEJEEBHOY
STATE OF RAJASTHAN Vs. LEELA JAIN
The preamble may, no doubt, be used to solve any ambiguity or to fix the meaning of words which may have more than one meaning, but it can, however, not be used to eliminate as redundant or unintended, the operative provisions of a statute. Full Judgment