Judgments - APPLICATION U/s 378 DEFECTIVE
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
S. SRIDHAR AND ORS. Vs. STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
M/S MUNEER ENTERPRISES MINE OWNERS BY PARTNER Vs. M/S RAMGAD MIN.& MINING P.LTD.& ORS.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
BARANAGORE JUTE FACTOR PLC Vs. SHREEKISHAN OMPRAKASH AND ANR
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
CHARU KISHOR MEHTA Vs. JT.CHARITY COMMR. GR. BOMBAY REG. & ORS.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
M/S. MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Vs. MAJOR GENERAL SHRI KANT SHARMA & ANR.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
GRAH RAKSHAK, HOME GUARDS WEL.ASSO. Vs. STATE OF H.P. & ORS.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
THE REVENUE DIV. OFFICER FORT KOCHI &ORS Vs. JALAJA DILEEP & ANR
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
HARMONY INNOVATION SHIPPING LTD. Vs. GUPTA COAL INDIA LTD. AND ANR
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
M/S.PREMIER BREVERIES LTD.KARNATAKA Vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
BHARGAVA & ASSOCIATES PVT.LTD.& ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
JIBAN KRISHNA MONDAL & ORS. Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
ARUNBHAI KALYANBHAI SUTARIYA Vs. NUTAN NAGRIK SAHAKARI BANK LTD.& ANR
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
V.KRISHNASWAMY & ANR. Vs. KARNATAKA RAJYA KAIGARIKA SAHAKARI &ANR.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
MOHD. AKBAR Vs. ASHOK SAHU & ORS.
Broadly, it is in the above-mentioned background the instant SLP came to be filed complaining that notwithstanding the mandate of Section 86, sub- Section (7) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, the High Court has not disposed of the election petition so far. It was the pious hope of the Parliament that election disputes under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 should be resolved expeditiously. The purpose is obvious. The tenure of the members of the Parliament as well as the Legislature of Full Judgment
Tags Election