Filter by Date
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S. SECURE METERS LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS, NEW DELHI

Appeal (Civil), 7526 of 2004, Judgment Date: May 05, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

K.RADHIKA Vs. T.RAJYA LAXMI & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 4201 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 05, 2015

It consists of innumerable errors. We only hope that it is not the desire of the High Court that such candidates are required to be appointed merely because they have the higher grade qualification. We, therefore, allow the appeal and set aside the judgment under appeal. Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD Vs. NEW PINK CITY NIRMAN SAHKA.SAM.LD.& ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 1527-1536 of 2013, Judgment Date: May 01, 2015

Constructive notice in legal fiction signifies that the individual person should know as a reasonable person would have. Even if they have no actual knowledge of it. Constructive notice means a man ought to have known a fact. A person is said to have notice of a fact when he actually knows a fact but for Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

JAGDISH CHAND SHARMA Vs. NARAIN SINGH SAINI (DEAD) THR. LRS. & ORS

Appeal (Civil), 4181-4182 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 01, 2015

14. As would be evident from the contents of Section 63 of the Act that to execute the Will as contemplated therein, the testator would have to sign or affix his mark to it or the same has to be signed by some other person in his presence and on his direction. Further the signature or mark of the testator or the signature of the person signing for him has to be so Full Judgment

Tags Will Evidence
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD Vs. NEW PINK CITY NIRMAN SAHKA.SAM.LD.& ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 1527-1536 of 2013, Judgment Date: May 01, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

NICHOLAS PIRAMAL INDIA LTD. Vs. HARISINGH

Appeal (Civil), 4436 of 2010, Judgment Date: Apr 30, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S ARIANE ORGACHEM PVT.LTD. Vs. WYETH EMPLOYEES UNION & ORS

Appeal (Civil), 246 of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 29, 2015

“When a question of law is raised for the first time in a court of last resort, upon the construction of a document, or upon facts either admitted or proved beyond controversy, it is not only competent but expedient, in the interests of justice, to entertain the plea.” Therefore, with regard to the above mentioned aspect regarding the plea of the competency of the Deputy Labour Commissioner to pass an Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

KHUB RAM Vs. DALBIR SINGH & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 2734 of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 29, 2015

  Mr. Patwalia has rightly placed reliance to support the aforesaid submissions, on a judgment of this Court in the case of Meghmala v. G. Narasimha Reddy (2010) 8 SCC 383. The law relating to effect of fraud upon a competent authority to get an appointment/office as well as effect of fraud upon court has been discussed in detail in paragraphs 28 to 36 Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S. ESCORTS LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, FARIDABAD

Appeal (Civil), 6561 of 2004, Judgment Date: Apr 29, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

PRADIP NANJEE GALA Vs. SALES TAX OFFICER & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 4542 of 2007, Judgment Date: Apr 29, 2015

The question raised before us is whether the respondent-Revenue could resile from a settlement entered into with the assessee on the basis of which the appellant has already paid and settled his dues under the Act. “In a Taxing Act one has to look merely at what is clearly said. There is no room for any intendment. There is no equity about a tax. There Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA Vs. C. L. VIMALA & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 4043 of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 28, 2015

it is the prerogative of the Creditor alone whether he would move against the principal debtor first or the surety, to realize the loan amount. “Therefore, the creditor has a right to obtain a decree against the surety and the principal debtor. The surety has no right to restrain execution of the decree against him until the creditor has exhausted his remedy against the principal debtor Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M.P. STEEL CORPORATION Vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE

Appeal (Civil), 4367 of 2004, Judgment Date: Apr 24, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9799 OF 2010 N

Appeal (Civil), 9799 of 2010, Judgment Date: Apr 24, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

VINOD KUMAR SUBBIAH Vs. SARASWATHI PALANIAPPAN

Appeal (Civil), 5511 - 5512 of 2014, Judgment Date: Apr 24, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

FATEHJI & COMPANY & ANR Vs. L.M. NAGPAL & ORS

Appeal (Civil), 3912 of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 24, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

COMMNR.,CUSTOMS & CENT.EXCISE AURANGABAD Vs. M/S. ROOFIT INDUSTRIES LTD.

Appeal (Civil), 5541 of 2004, Judgment Date: Apr 23, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M.P. STEEL CORPORATION Vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE

Appeal (Civil), 4367 of 2004, Judgment Date: Apr 23, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

K.DEVAKIMMA AND ORS. Vs. TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS AND ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 5768 of 2006, Judgment Date: Apr 23, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

NIRLON LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI

Appeal (Civil), 7642 of 2004, Judgment Date: Apr 23, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

M/S. COCHIN PORT TRUST Vs. STATE OF KERALA

Appeal (Civil), 1906 of 2007, Judgment Date: Apr 22, 2015

Full Judgment