Judgments - APPLICATION U/s 378 DEFECTIVE

In view of the aforesaid analysis, we proceed to summarise our conclusions as follows:- (A) Whether a letters patent appeal would lie against the order passed by the learned Single Judge that has travelled to him from the other tribunals or authorities, would depend upon many a facet. The Court fee payable on a petition to make it under Article 226 or Article 227 or both, would depend upon Full Judgment

Tags Jurisdiction

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA Vs. PAN ASIA ADVISORS LTD. & ANR

Appeal (Civil), 10560 of 2013, Judgment Date: Jul 06, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

LAXAMI DEVI Vs. STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 3385 of 2012, Judgment Date: Jul 03, 2015

The legal nodus that we are called upon to unravel in this Appeal is whether the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (L.A. Act for brevity) as amended from time to time, requires an Award to be passed even in respect of lands expropriated by the State pursuant to the exercise of special powers in cases of urgency contained in Section 17 thereof. It is indeed ironical that what Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SURENDRA KUMAR & ORS Vs. GREATER NOIDA IND. DEVELOPMENT AUTH.&ORS

Appeal (Civil), 4916 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 02, 2015

The main issue that arises for consideration is whether the policy decision extending the benefit of regularisation to contractual employees against 60% vacant posts will be deemed to regularise the services of the appellants from the retrospective date, that is, 20.11.2002, when the said posts were first advertised. The appellants were Full Judgment

Tags Regularisation Service Law / Matter , Provident Funds Workmen

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

ZUARI CEMENT LTD. Vs. REGIONAL DIRECTOR,E.S.I CORP.& ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 5138-40 of 2007, Judgment Date: Jul 02, 2015

Where there is want of jurisdiction, the order passed by the court/tribunal is a nullity or non-est. What is relevant is whether the Court had the power to grant the relief asked for. ESI Court did not have the jurisdiction to consider the question of grant of exemption, order passed by the ESI Court granting exemption and consequently setting aside the demand notices is Full Judgment

Tags Jurisdiction

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

NK RAJENDRA MOHAN Vs. THIRVAMADI RUBBER CO. LTD AND ORS

Appeal (Civil), 5163 of 2012, Judgment Date: Jul 02, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Civil Procedure

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

OIL & NATURAL GAS CORP. LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX & ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 731 of 2007, Judgment Date: Jul 02, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

UNION OF INDIA Vs. M/S BRIGHT POWER PROJECTS(I) P.LTD.

Appeal (Civil), 2404 of 2004, Judgment Date: Jul 02, 2015

When parties to the contract had agreed to the fact that interest would not be awarded on the amount payable to the contractor under the contract, in our opinion, they were bound by their understanding. Having once agreed that the contractor would not claim Full Judgment

Tags Arbitration Interest