Judgments - APPLICATION U/s 378 DEFECTIVE
STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Vs. ABDUL ALI AND ORS.
PEPSU ROAD TPT CORPN, PATIALA Vs. AMANDEEP SINGH & ORS.
In view of the above, it is well settled that the notice inviting option need not to be personally served to the employees unless the Regulation or any instruction so provides. From the facts of the present case it is clear that although Regulations were in force from 1992, plaintiff retired on 30th November, 2011 and after retirement received CPF benefits without any protest and Full Judgment
BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET Vs. CRICKET AASOCIATION OF BIHAR & ORS. - 03/01/2017
ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EPFO AND ANR. Vs. THE MANAGEMENT OF RSL TEXTILES INDIA PVT. LTD. THR. ITS DIRECTOR.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. HARDWARI LAL RANA & ORS
ALLAHABAD BANK & ORS Vs. KRISHNA NARAYAN TEWARI
BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET Vs. CRICKET ASSOCIATION OF BIHAR & ORS. - 02/01/2017
HARJAS RAI MAKHIJA (D) THR.LRS. Vs. PUSHPARANI JAIN & ANR.
ABHIRAM SINGH Vs. C.D. COMMACHEN (DEAD) BY LRS.& ORS.
KRISHNA KUMAR SINGH & ANR Vs. STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. MAZHAR KHAN @ PAPPU AND ORS.
STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs. SANTOSH GUPTA AND ANR. ETC.
AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Vs. GTL INFRA. LTD. & ORS. ETC.
C.I.T & ANR Vs. M/S YOKOGAWA INDIA LTD.
MOHAMMED ZUBAIR CORPORAL NO.781467-G Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
LALITESHWAR PRASAD SINGH & ORS. Vs. S.P.SRIVASTAVA(D) TR.LR
VIJAY SHANKAR MISHRA Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
More importantly, certain inbuilt safeguards against discharge from service based on four red ink entries have also been prescribed. The first and foremost is an unequivocal declaration that mere award of four red ink entries to an individual does not make his discharge mandatory. This implies that four red ink entries is not some kind of Laxman Full Judgment