Judgments - APPLICATION U/s 378 DEFECTIVE
DINSHAW RUSI MEHTA AND ANR. Vs. STATE OF MAHARASTRA AND ORS.
G N SUBRAMANYA UPADHYAYA Vs. SOUMYA M. HEGDE
MAHARASHTRA SHIKSHAN SANSTHA & ANR. Vs. DILIP GANPATRAO LANJEWAR & ANR.
VED PRAKASH ARYA @ RAMJEE & ANR. Vs. PANNA LAL & ORS
GURBACHAN SINGH Vs. RAVINDER PAUL MOHINDRA & ORS.
BARANAGORE JUTE FACTORY PLC. MAZDOOR SANGH (BMS) ETC. Vs. BARANAGORE JUTE FACTORY PLC. ETC
ALI MOHAMMAD BEIGH AND ORS Vs. STATE OF J & K
T.RAVI & ANR Vs. B.CHINNA NARASIMHA & ORS. ETC
OM PRAKASH AND ANR. Vs. MISHRI LAL (DEAD) REP. BY HIS LR. SAVITRI DEVI
That a tenant during the continuance of the tenancy is debarred on the doctrine of estoppel from denying the title of his landlord through whom he claims tenancy, as is enshrined in Section 116 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, is so well-settled a legal postulation that no decision need be cited to further consolidate the same. Full Judgment
M/S. BRAKEWEL AUTOMOTIVE COMPONENTS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. Vs. P.R. SELVAM ALAGAPPAN
NEERAJ KUMAR SAINY AND ORS. Vs. STATE OF U.P AND ORS.
RAM KISHAN FAUJI Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS
“The expression "civil proceeding" is not defined in the Constitution, nor in the General Clauses Act. The expression in our judgment covers all proceedings in which a party asserts the existence of a civil right conferred by the civil law or by statute, and claims relief for breach thereof.” “A criminal proceeding on the other hand is ordinarily Full Judgment
PALANISAMY AND ORS Vs. K. DHANPALAN
The moot question is: whether the enquiry conducted by the Disciplinary Committee in the present case can be said to be a fair and proper enquiry? Since the allegations made against the appellants were serious and the finding of guilt recorded against them inevitably had civil consequences, it is cardinal that they should have been allowed to cross- examine Full Judgment