Judgments - APPLICATION U/s 378 DEFECTIVE
MOHAMMED ZUBAIR CORPORAL NO.781467-G Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
LALITESHWAR PRASAD SINGH & ORS. Vs. S.P.SRIVASTAVA(D) TR.LR
VIJAY SHANKAR MISHRA Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
More importantly, certain inbuilt safeguards against discharge from service based on four red ink entries have also been prescribed. The first and foremost is an unequivocal declaration that mere award of four red ink entries to an individual does not make his discharge mandatory. This implies that four red ink entries is not some kind of Laxman Full Judgment
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY SEC.&ORS Vs. K. BALU & ANR.
NATIONAL CAMPAIGN ON D.H. RIGHTS & ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
J.ASHOKA Vs. UNIV.OF AGR.SC.& ORS.
GREAVES COTTON LIMITED Vs. UNITED MACHINERY AND APPLIANCES
CORRESPONDENT, ANAIKAR ORIENTAL (ARABIC) HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL AND ANR. Vs. A. HAROON AND ANR.
UNION OF INDIA Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.
CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE AND ORS Vs. ABRAR ALI
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. SURESH KUMAR NANGIA AND ORS.
RATTAN LAL Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.
JIVANLAL Vs. PRAVIN KRISHNA, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS.
CENTURY 21 MALLS PVT LTD Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. RADHA NAGPAL & ORS.
HARYANA VIDHYUT PRASARAN NIGAM LTD. Vs. HARYANA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ANR.
M/S ALCON ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD. Vs. CELEM S.A. OF FOS 34320 ROUJAN, FRANCE & ANR.
PRESIDENT,VIDYA PRASARAK SAMITHI,RAMDURG Vs. DY.COMMR.,BELGAUM DIST. & ORS.
CEO, KRISHNA DISTRICT COOP. CENTRAL BANK LTD AND ANR Vs. K HANUMANTHA RAO AND ANR
The impugned order is also faulted for the reason that it is not the function of the High Court to impose a particular punishment even in those cases where it was found that penalty awarded by the employer is shockingly disproportionate. In such a case, the matter could, at the best, be remanded to the disciplinary authority for imposition of lesser punishment leaving it to such authority to consider Full Judgment