Judgments - APPLICATION U/s 378 DEFECTIVE
MEHMOODA GULSHAN Vs. JAVAID HUSSAIN MUNGLOO
Whether the requirement of the landlord for own occupation could also mean occupation by a member of the family, in this case, the son, is the short question arising for consideration. The premises sought to be evicted is not held for the benefit of the son alone; but the whole family. It is for the own occupation of the landlord. It has been established in the facts of this case that the landlord was not happy and Full Judgment
DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (IT) - I Vs. A.P. MOLLER MAERSK A/S/
SARDAR NIHAL SINGH & ANR. Vs. JAT DHARAMSHALA SAMITI, HARIDWAR & ANR.
COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHANDIGARH Vs. M/S. STESALIT LTD.
FATEH SINGH (D) THR. LRS. Vs. HARI CHAND & ORS.
SHIVAKUMAR M. Vs. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, BMTC
MAHENDRA POPATLAL SHAH & ANR. Vs. M/S. JETHANAND & SONS
ORISSA INDUSTRIAL INFRA.DEV. CORPORATION Vs. M/S MESCO KALINGA STEEL LTD. & ORS.
COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHANDIGARH Vs. M/S. STESALIT LTD.
Nidhi Kaim and another Vs State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Besides, the consideration recorded by us, in the foregoing paragraphs, we may confess, that we felt persuaded for taking the view that we have, for a very important reason – national character. There is a saying – when wealth is lost, nothing is lost; when health is lost, something is lost; but when character is lost, Full Judgment
VIVEK SINGH Vs. ROMANI SINGH
EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ARULMIGU CHOKKANATHASWAMY KOIL TRUST VIRUDHUNAGAR Vs. CHANDRAN & ORS
B.K.PAVITRA & ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
It is clear from the above discussion that exercise for determining ‘inadequacy of representation’, ‘backwardness’ and ‘overall efficiency’, is a must for exercise of power under Article 16(4A). Mere fact that there is no proportionate representation in promotional posts for the population of SCs and STs is not by itself enough to grant consequential seniority to promotees who are otherwise junior and thereby denying seniority to those who are given Full Judgment
VIJAY KUMAR AHLUWALIA AND ORS Vs. BISHAN CHAND MAHESHWARI AND ANR
It is a settled principle of law that while considering the grant of leave to contest the eviction proceedings under the Rent Laws, the Authority/Court is not expected to examine the merits and demerits of the grounds raised in the application for grant of leave to contest and if the Authority/Court finds that the grounds raised prima facie disclose Full Judgment
NIDHI Vs. RAM KRIPAL SHARMA (D) THR. LRS.
The point falling for consideration is whether the marriage of the appellant/landlady as subsequent event can extinguish the bona fide requirement of a landlady and disentitle her for the relief sought in the release application filed prior to her marriage. In the facts of present case, the change in subsequent events is not such that would deprive the appellant of her Full Judgment