Judgments - Appeal (Crl.)
M/s. Sunder Marketing Associates versus State of Haryana & Ors.
DR. NAROTTAM MISHRA VERSUS RAJENDRA BHARTI & ORS.
DR. NAROTTAM MISHRA VERSUS SHRI RAJENDRA BHARTI & ORS.
DR. NAROTTAM MISHRA VERSUS SHRI RAJENDRA BHARTI & ORS. Full Judgment
ARUN S/O SHANKAR DOKHE AND ANR Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
BHOGIREDDI VARALAKSHMI & ORS Vs. MANI MUTHUPANDI AND ORS
SASI (D) THR LRS Vs. ARAVINDAKSHAN NAIR AND ORS
DNYANDEO SABAJI NAIK AND ANR. Vs. PRADNYA PRAKASH KHADEKAR AND ORS.
REENA SURESH ALHAT Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
LALITA RAMESH LASE & ORS. Vs. JAIRAJ KANTILAL SONAWALA & ORS.
NOIDA TOLL BRIDGE COMPANY LTD. Vs. FEDERATION OF NOIDA RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION AND ORS.
ST. MARY'S HOTEL PVT. LTD. AND ORS. Vs. T.O. ALEYAS AND ORS.
AVTAR SINGH Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
UNION OF INDIA Vs. M/S AMBIKA CONSTRUCION
The issue involved in the reference is in regard to the power of the Arbitrator to award pendente lite interest when contract contains bar for grant of interest in a case covered by the Arbitration Act, 1940 Thus, our answer to the reference is that if contract expressly bars award of interest pendente lite, the same cannot be awarded by the Arbitrator. We also make Full Judgment
AXON CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. Vs. OM ASTHA CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. AND ORS
SURESH NARAYAN KADAM & ORS. Vs. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & ORS.
CALCUTTA STOCK EXCHANGE Vs. M/S BLB LIMITED
SANT RAM Vs. DHAN KAUR & ORS.
It is a settled principle of law that only those issues could be given up by the party which are the subject matter of the lis before the Court. Since in the petition before this Court, the issue with regard to award of mesne profits at the rate of 30/- p.m. was not the subject matter at the instance of any party to the lis, the question of Full Judgment