Judgments - AMALGAMATION ORDER

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S MUNEER ENTERPRISES MINE OWNERS BY PARTNER Vs. M/S RAMGAD MIN.& MINING P.LTD.& ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 2818 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 12, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

BARANAGORE JUTE FACTOR PLC Vs. SHREEKISHAN OMPRAKASH AND ANR

Appeal (Civil), 2814-2815 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 12, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

CHARU KISHOR MEHTA Vs. JT.CHARITY COMMR. GR. BOMBAY REG. & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 2819 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 12, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S. MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI

Appeal (Civil), 8190 of 2003, Judgment Date: Mar 12, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

KALYANI MATHIVANAN Vs. K V KEYARAJ AND ORS

Appeal (Civil), 5946-5947 of 2014, Judgment Date: Mar 11, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Vs. MAJOR GENERAL SHRI KANT SHARMA & ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 7400 of 2013, Judgment Date: Mar 11, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

GRAH RAKSHAK, HOME GUARDS WEL.ASSO. Vs. STATE OF H.P. & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 2759 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 11, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

AMBIKAPATI AMMAL & ANR. Vs. KANDASWAMY KOIL

Appeal (Civil), 4021 of 2007, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

THE REVENUE DIV. OFFICER FORT KOCHI &ORS Vs. JALAJA DILEEP & ANR

Appeal (Civil), 2749 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

RAJ KUMAR RANA Vs. RITA RATHORE

Appeal (Civil), 6161 of 2010, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

HARMONY INNOVATION SHIPPING LTD. Vs. GUPTA COAL INDIA LTD. AND ANR

Appeal (Civil), 610 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S.PREMIER BREVERIES LTD.KARNATAKA Vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN

Appeal (Civil), 1569 of 2007, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

BHARGAVA & ASSOCIATES PVT.LTD.& ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 5099 of 2008, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

JIBAN KRISHNA MONDAL & ORS. Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 6373 of 2010, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

ARUNBHAI KALYANBHAI SUTARIYA Vs. NUTAN NAGRIK SAHAKARI BANK LTD.& ANR

Appeal (Civil), 2822 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

V.KRISHNASWAMY & ANR. Vs. KARNATAKA RAJYA KAIGARIKA SAHAKARI &ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 2874 - 75 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

ANIL JOSHI & ORS. Vs. STATE OF H.P.& ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 6097-6100 of 2009, Judgment Date: Mar 09, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

U.O.I & ORS Vs. GURDAYAL SINGH

Appeal (Civil), 2865-2866 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 09, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

MOHD. AKBAR Vs. ASHOK SAHU & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 2538-40 of 2015, Judgment Date: Feb 27, 2015

Broadly, it is in the above-mentioned background the instant SLP came to be filed complaining that notwithstanding the mandate of Section 86, sub- Section (7) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, the High Court has not disposed of the election petition so far. It was the pious hope of the Parliament that election disputes under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 should be resolved expeditiously. The purpose is obvious. The tenure of the members of the Parliament as well as the Legislature of Full Judgment

Tags Election

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S SHERALI KHAN MOHAMED MANEKIA Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 2475-2476 of 2015, Judgment Date: Feb 27, 2015

The short question, therefore, that falls for consideration is as to whether after the disposal of the appeal, the Court Receiver stands discharged or whether he continues in his office till an order of discharge is passed by the Court? In our view, when a Receiver is appointed pending suit or appeal, the prime objective is to preserve the property by taking possession Full Judgment

Tags CPC Receiver