Filter by Date
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

PVR LIMITED Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 10091 of 2010, Judgment Date: Mar 25, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

DASHMESH EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY Vs. PUNJAB URBAN DEVE.AUTHORITY & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 4684 - 4685 of 2005, Judgment Date: Mar 25, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

MOHAN SINGH GILL & ORS. ETC. ETC. Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. ETC. ETC.

Appeal (Civil), 3177 - 3178 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 25, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX OFFICER & ANR. Vs. GOODRICKE GROUP LTD. & ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 9043 of 2003, Judgment Date: Mar 25, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

D.D.A. Vs. GAURAV KUKREJA

Appeal (Civil), 3124 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 24, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF MP Vs. NOMI SINGH & ANR

Appeal (Civil), 3050 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 24, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF H P AND ORS Vs. PUNRA DEVI

Appeal (Civil), 34795 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 24, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, GAUHATI & ORS. Vs. M/S. SATI OIL UDYOG LTD. & ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 9133 - 9134 of 2003, Judgment Date: Mar 24, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S MILLENNIUM WIRES P LTD Vs. STATE TRADING CORP. OF INDIA LTD & ORS

Appeal (Civil), 3103 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 23, 2015

It would suffice to say here that injunctions against the negotiating banks for making payments to the beneficiary must be given cautiously as constant judicial interference in the normal practices of market can have disastrous consequences as it affects the trustworthiness of the Indian banks and markets. In the circumstances as narrated above and in light of the settled law on the point of injunction against the banks to honour their Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

RAMESH Vs. HARBANS NAGPAL & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 3105 - 3106 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 23, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

ANIRUDH KUMAR Vs. MUNICIPAL CORP. OF DELHI & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 8284 of 2013, Judgment Date: Mar 20, 2015

Be as that may, this nature of ligation cannot be allowed to be settled between the parties as it involves public interest and violation of rule of law. The running of the Pathological Lab in the building by the respondent-owners amount to violation of the rule of law and affects the public interest, therefore, it is public interest litigation even though the appellant herein Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

AVAS AYUKT,U.P.AVAS EVAM VIKAS PAR.& ORS Vs. BHAGWAN TIWARI & ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 3134 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 20, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

VIPULBHAI M. CHAUDHARY Vs. GUJARAT COOP. MILK MARKT. FED. LTD & ORS

Appeal (Civil), 3047 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 19, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

DHROPADABAI & ORS. Vs. M/S. TECHNOCRAFT TOOLINGS

Appeal (Civil), 8155 of 2014, Judgment Date: Mar 19, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

T.NADU TERMD.FULL TIME TEM.LIC EMP.ASSN. Vs. LIFE INSURANCE CORP.OF INDIA & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 6950 of 2009, Judgment Date: Mar 18, 2015

The concerned workmen are the members of the appellant-Associations, Federation of Employees Association, Workers Association and other concerned individual workmen who were working in the branches of the Corporation at various places in the country have raised the existing industrial dispute between the concerned workmen and the management of Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF MP. & ORS. Vs. MALA BANERJEE

Appeal (Civil), 2944 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 17, 2015

3 Very briefly stated, the dispute pertains to the eligibility of the Respondents, all of whom are Lecturers/Teachers in the employment of the Education and Tribal Welfare Department, Government of Madhya Pradesh, for increased pay scales. The Respondents claim the benefits of the Kramonnati Scheme with effect from 19.4.1999, whereas the Appellants assert that they are willing to grant the benefit of the Kramonnati Scheme Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD. Vs. INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORP.& ORS

Appeal (Civil), 2932 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 17, 2015

The issue falling for consideration is whether minutes of meeting can override statutory regulations. Article 77 of the Constitution of India deals with the conduct of business of Government of India while Article 166 of the Constitution of India deals with the conduct of business of the Government of Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

JYOTI LIMITED AND OTHERS Vs. BHARAT J. PATEL & OTHERS

Appeal (Civil), 2935-36 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 17, 2015

The maintainability of a suit is question of law. Though, by virtue of declaration under Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, all suits of civil nature are maintainable unless barred either by an express provision or by implication of law. We are of the opinion that the directions in paras 7.2 and 7.3 are inconsistent with the directions in para 7.4. Apart from Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India ()

TATA STEEL LTD Vs. UOI & ORS

Appeal (Civil), 2938-2939 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 17, 2015

The appeals are disposed of as above. The question for our consideration in the set of appeals filed by Tata Steel is whether royalty is chargeable under Section 9 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and the Second Schedule thereto on raw or unprocessed or Run-of-Mine (ROM) coal at the pit-head or is it chargeable on coal after it is processed and Full Judgment

Tags Royalty
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SURTI GUPTA Vs. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. & ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 2933 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 17, 2015

It has also been observed by the High Court for the purpose of calculation of future loss of dependency of the appellant that the deceased at the time of the accident on 10.7.1990 was drawing a salary of Rs.4,214/- per month and was 45 years of age. However, we are of the view that the salary of the deceased at the time of her death taken by the High Court Full Judgment