Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 2261-2262
of 2012, Judgment Date: Oct 29, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 6774
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 29, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 9149-9150
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 29, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 8918
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 28, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 5015
of 2008, Judgment Date: Oct 28, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 5293
of 2010, Judgment Date: Oct 27, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 8879
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 27, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 8909
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 27, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 32135
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 16, 2015
The first and foremost is an unequivocal
declaration that mere award of four red ink entries to an individual does
not make his discharge mandatory. This implies that four red ink entries is
not some kind of laxman rekha, which if crossed would by itself render the
individual concerned undesirable or unworthy of retention in the force.
Award of four red ink entries simply pushes the individual concerned into a
grey area where Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 1098
of 2012, Judgment Date: Oct 16, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 8731
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 16, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 6305-6307
of 2009, Judgment Date: Oct 16, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 1770
of 2005, Judgment Date: Oct 16, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 7217
of 2013, Judgment Date: Oct 16, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 10547-10548
of 2011, Judgment Date: Oct 15, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 8663-8664
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 15, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4267
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 15, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 8662
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 15, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 8606-8610
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 14, 2015
What was held, in our view, was that scaling is
a method which was generally unsuitable to be adopted for evaluation of
answer papers of subjects common to all candidates and that the application
of the said method to the examination in question had resulted in
unacceptable results.
Holding of public examinations involving wide and Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 8648
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 14, 2015
Full Judgment
