Judgments - AMALGAMATION ORDER
COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHANDIGARH Vs. M/S. STESALIT LTD.
Nidhi Kaim and another Vs State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Besides, the consideration recorded by us, in the foregoing paragraphs, we may confess, that we felt persuaded for taking the view that we have, for a very important reason – national character. There is a saying – when wealth is lost, nothing is lost; when health is lost, something is lost; but when character is lost, Full Judgment
VIVEK SINGH Vs. ROMANI SINGH
EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ARULMIGU CHOKKANATHASWAMY KOIL TRUST VIRUDHUNAGAR Vs. CHANDRAN & ORS
B.K.PAVITRA & ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
It is clear from the above discussion that exercise for determining ‘inadequacy of representation’, ‘backwardness’ and ‘overall efficiency’, is a must for exercise of power under Article 16(4A). Mere fact that there is no proportionate representation in promotional posts for the population of SCs and STs is not by itself enough to grant consequential seniority to promotees who are otherwise junior and thereby denying seniority to those who are given Full Judgment
VIJAY KUMAR AHLUWALIA AND ORS Vs. BISHAN CHAND MAHESHWARI AND ANR
It is a settled principle of law that while considering the grant of leave to contest the eviction proceedings under the Rent Laws, the Authority/Court is not expected to examine the merits and demerits of the grounds raised in the application for grant of leave to contest and if the Authority/Court finds that the grounds raised prima facie disclose Full Judgment
NIDHI Vs. RAM KRIPAL SHARMA (D) THR. LRS.
The point falling for consideration is whether the marriage of the appellant/landlady as subsequent event can extinguish the bona fide requirement of a landlady and disentitle her for the relief sought in the release application filed prior to her marriage. In the facts of present case, the change in subsequent events is not such that would deprive the appellant of her Full Judgment
DURGA PRASAD Vs. NARAYAN RAM CHANDAANI (D) THR. LR
STATE OF U.P. Vs. PURAN SINGH & ORS.
MGR INDUSTRIES ASSO. AND ANR Vs. STATE OF U P AND ORS
PUKHARAJMAL SAGARMAL LUNKAD(D)BY LRS&ORS Vs. THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, JALGAON & ORS
UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION Vs. MAHARISHI MAHESH YOGI VEDIC VISHWAVIDYALAYA
MEERUT KENDRIYA THOK UPBHOKTA SAHAKARI BANDAR Vs. VAKIL CHAND JAIN AND ORS ETC.ETC.Q
STATE OF H.P. AND ORS. Vs. NAVAL KUMAR ALIAS ROHIT KUMAR
SANDEEP KHANUJA Vs. ATUL DANDE & ANR.
P. SIVANANDI Vs. RAJEEV KUMAR & ORS.
These appeals raise a narrow question for consideration, namely, whether the Annual Confidential Report (ACR) of an officer forms a part of his ‘service record’ and whether it could be ignored for the purposes of his promotion merely on the ground that it was written after some delay. In our opinion, the ACR of an officer forms a part of his service record and he cannot be Full Judgment