Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4354
of 2017, Judgment Date: Mar 22, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 3939
of 2007, Judgment Date: Mar 22, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4298-4299
of 2017, Judgment Date: Mar 21, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4295-4297
of 2017, Judgment Date: Mar 21, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4731- 4732
of 2010, Judgment Date: Mar 21, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4309
of 2017, Judgment Date: Mar 21, 2017
That a tenant during the continuance of the tenancy is debarred on
the doctrine of estoppel from denying the title of his landlord through
whom he claims tenancy, as is enshrined in Section 116 of the Indian
Evidence Act, 1872, is so well-settled a legal postulation that no
decision need be cited to further consolidate the same. Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4313-4314
of 2017, Judgment Date: Mar 21, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 11974
of 2016, Judgment Date: Mar 21, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4288
of 2017, Judgment Date: Mar 21, 2017
“The expression "civil proceeding" is not defined in the Constitution, nor
in the General Clauses Act. The expression in our judgment covers all
proceedings in which a party asserts the existence of a civil right
conferred by the civil law or by statute, and claims relief for breach
thereof.”
“A criminal proceeding on the other hand is ordinarily Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 8299
of 2010, Judgment Date: Mar 21, 2017
The moot question is: whether the enquiry conducted by the
Disciplinary Committee in the present case can be said to be a fair and
proper enquiry? Since the allegations made against the appellants were
serious and the finding of guilt recorded against them inevitably had civil
consequences, it is cardinal that they should have been allowed to cross-
examine Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4311-4312
of 2017, Judgment Date: Mar 21, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4355-4356
of 2017, Judgment Date: Mar 21, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4387
of 2017, Judgment Date: Mar 20, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4280
of 2017, Judgment Date: Mar 20, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 3885
of 2017, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 3903
of 2017, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 3910
of 2017, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 3905
of 2017, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 3798
of 2017, Judgment Date: Mar 09, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 5924
of 2005, Judgment Date: Mar 09, 2017
Full Judgment
