Judgments - ACQA->ACQUITTAL APPEAL [ APPEAL U/S 378 ]
NAVTEJ SINGH JOHAR & ORS. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA THR. SECRETARY MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE
DR.NAVTEJ SINGH Vs. STATE OF NCT & ANR.
Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms Versus Union of India and Others
NIKESH TARACHAND SHAH VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
Kamini Jaiswal Vs. Union of India & Anr.
Extra Judl. Exec. Victim Families Assn. & Anr. Versus Union of India & Ors.
RE:EXPLOI.OF CHILN.INJ ORPH.IN ST.OF T.N Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
IN RE: Vs. TO ISSUE CERTAIN GUIDELINES REGARDING INADEQUACIES AND DEFICIENCIES IN CRIMINAL
ASHIQ HUSSAIN FAKTOO Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The principle of ex debito justitiae is founded on a recognition of a debt that the justice delivery system owes to a litigant to correct an error in a judicial dispensation. Its application, by the very nature of things, cannot be made to depend on varying perceptions of legal omissions and commissions but such recognition of the debt which have the potential of opening new vistas of Full Judgment
EXTRA JUDL.EXEC.VICTIM FAMILIES ASSN&ANR Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
TARA SINGH AND ORS Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. - NDPS
DR. RINI JOHAR & ANR. Vs. STATE OF M.P.&ORS. Dated - June 03, 2016
VERHOEVEN, MARIE-EMMANUELLE Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2. The principal question for consideration is whether there is a binding extradition treaty in terms of Section 2(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 between India and Chile. Our answer to this question is in the affirmative. 3. The subsidiary question, equally important, is assuming there is no binding extradition treaty between India and Chile, whether Full Judgment
UNION OF INDIA Vs. V. SRIHARAN @ ,MURUGAN & ORS.
YAKUB ABDUL RAZAK MEMON Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. THE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT AND ORS.
SHABNAM Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
The present writ petitions are filed on the allegations that on 21.05.2015, death warrants have been issued by the learned Sessions Judge, which are impermissible inasmuch as various remedies which are available to the convicts, even after the dismissal of the appeals by this Court, are still open and yet to be exercised by them. It is submitted that these convicts can file review petition seeking review of Full Judgment
SHREYA SINGHAL VERSUS UNION OF INDIA
This batch of writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India raises very important and far-reaching questions relatable primarily to the fundamental right of free speech and expression guaranteed by Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. The immediate cause for concern in these petitions is Section 66A of the Information Technology Act of 2000. 119. Full Judgment