Judgments - RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

FERANI HOTELS PVT. LTD. Versus THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER GREATER MUMBAI & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 9064-9065 of 2018, Judgment Date: Sep 27, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Right To Information

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Deepak alias Preetam Verma and Anr. Vs. State of MP & Anr.

MCRC, 12592 of 2018, Judgment Date: Sep 11, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Quashing Of FIR

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Rohit Jain Vs. M.P.P.S.C. & Another

WRIT PETITION, 9519 of 2017, Judgment Date: Aug 28, 2018

Law laid down - 1. Doctrine of Estoppel cannot be used as a shelter when the constitutional body itself commits a mistake or illegality in evaluating the answer sheet of the candidate. More so, when it is obliged to evaluate the answer sheet with accuracy and precision. 2. In absence of any provision under the statute/regulations, the Court should not ‘generally’ direct revaluation. In a case where error is glaring, apparent and admitted, direction for rechecking, re-evaluation can be granted. Full Judgment

Tags Right To Information

Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)

Chhattisgarh Board of Secondary Versus Public Information Office

WPC->WRIT PETITION ALL ORDERS CIVIL [ RELATED TO OTHER MATTER ], 768 of 2013, Judgment Date: Jul 06, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Right To Information

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ETC VERSUS ANGESH KUMAR & ORS. ETC.

Appeal (Civil), 6162 of 2013, Judgment Date: Feb 20, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Right To Information

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Tarunveer Singh Vs. Mahesh Prasad Bhargava

SA, 350 of 2003, Judgment Date: Dec 21, 2017

Full Judgment

Tags Decree

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Munawwar Ali & others Versus Union of India & others

WRIT PETITION, 8830 of 2017, Judgment Date: Nov 13, 2017

Law Laid Down - Merely because a person has a locus standi to file the writ petition, does not mean that he is entitled to any equitable or legal relief in writ jurisdiction. Equitable relief on the ground of adverse possession against the State - Negated. Supreme Court judgments reported as (2000) 5 SCC 652 (State of Rajasthan vs. Harphool Singh); (2011) 10 SCC 404 (State of Haryana vs. Mukesh Kumar) and (2014) 1 SCC 669 (Gurdwara Sahib vs. Gram Panchayat Village Full Judgment

Tags Land Acquisition Recovery Of Possession

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)