Judgments - RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005
Aseer Jamal Versus Union of India & Ors.
FERANI HOTELS PVT. LTD. Versus THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER GREATER MUMBAI & ORS.
Deepak alias Preetam Verma and Anr. Vs. State of MP & Anr.
Rohit Jain Vs. M.P.P.S.C. & Another
Law laid down - 1. Doctrine of Estoppel cannot be used as a shelter when the constitutional body itself commits a mistake or illegality in evaluating the answer sheet of the candidate. More so, when it is obliged to evaluate the answer sheet with accuracy and precision. 2. In absence of any provision under the statute/regulations, the Court should not ‘generally’ direct revaluation. In a case where error is glaring, apparent and admitted, direction for rechecking, re-evaluation can be granted. Full Judgment
Chhattisgarh Board of Secondary Versus Public Information Office
UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ETC VERSUS ANGESH KUMAR & ORS. ETC.
Munawwar Ali & others Versus Union of India & others
Law Laid Down - Merely because a person has a locus standi to file the writ petition, does not mean that he is entitled to any equitable or legal relief in writ jurisdiction. Equitable relief on the ground of adverse possession against the State - Negated. Supreme Court judgments reported as (2000) 5 SCC 652 (State of Rajasthan vs. Harphool Singh); (2011) 10 SCC 404 (State of Haryana vs. Mukesh Kumar) and (2014) 1 SCC 669 (Gurdwara Sahib vs. Gram Panchayat Village Full Judgment
Canara Bank Rep. by its Deputy Gen. Manager VERSUS C.S. Shyam & Anr.
NIRUPAM BANERJEE VS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
SHAMIK NAG Vs. THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE AND ORS
SHAMIK NAG Vs. THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE AND ORS Full Judgment