Filter by Date
Karnataka High Court (Single Judge)

SELVI J. JAYALALITHA Vs STATE, BY THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIGILANCE AND ANTI-CORRUPTION SPECIAL INVESTIGATION CELL CHENNAI

Criminal Appeal, 835 of 2014, Judgment Date: May 11, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Corruption
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF A.P. Vs. P.VENKATESHWARLU

Appeal (Crl.), 1317 of 2008, Judgment Date: May 06, 2015

The demand and acceptance of the amount as illegal gratification is a sine qua non for constituting an offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The prosecution is duty bound to establish that there was illegal offer of bribe and acceptance thereof and it has to be founded on facts. The offence under Section 7 of P.C. Act has been confirmed by the Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Vs. KESAVAPATNAM CHINA SWAMY

Appeal (Crl.), 89 of 2009, Judgment Date: May 06, 2015

Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

M/S Hcl Infosystem Ltd. Vs. C.B.I.

APPLICATION U/s 482, 6623 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 01, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

K. ANBAZHAGAN Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS

Appeal (Crl.), 637 of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 27, 2015

We are called upon in this appeal to decide whether the 4th respondent was authorised to represent the case of the prosecution in the High Court of Karnataka in the appeals filed by the accused persons against their conviction by the Special Court, and if he was not so authorised, whether Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

KEDARI LAL Vs. STATE OF MP

Appeal (Crl.), 782 of 2011, Judgment Date: Mar 23, 2015

The expression "known sources of income" in Section 13(1) (e) of the Act has two elements, first the income must be received from a lawful source and secondly the receipt of such income must have been intimated in accordance with the provisions of law, rules or orders for the time being applicable to the public servant. The categories so enumerated are illustrative. Receipt by way of share Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Ramesh Handa Vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others

APPLICATION U/s 482, 5613 of 2015, Judgment Date: Feb 25, 2015

Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Renu Saxena Vs C.B.I., Ghaziabad

APPLICATION U/s 482, 5043 of 2015, Judgment Date: Feb 23, 2015

Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Vinod Kumar Srivastava Vs State Of U.P. And Another

CRIMINAL REVISION, 620 of 2015, Judgment Date: Feb 18, 2015

Full Judgment

Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)

Ayesha Bano & others Vs State of Chhattisgarh

CRMP->CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION, 440 of 2014, Judgment Date: Jan 20, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

SUNIL BHARTI MITTAL Vs. CBI

Appeal (Civil), 34 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jan 09, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Corruption
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SUDERSHAN KUMAR Vs. STATE OF H.P.

Appeal (Crl.), 1404, 1445-1446, 1447-1448 of 2011, Judgment Date: Dec 18, 2014

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE TR.INSP.OF POLICE Vs. A.ARUN KUMAR & ANR.

Appeal (Crl.), 2602 of 2014, Judgment Date: Dec 17, 2014

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. LABH SINGH

Appeal (Crl.), 2168 of 2010, Judgment Date: Dec 17, 2014

Full Judgment

Tags Corruption
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

S.DINESH KUMAR Vs. STATE TR.INSPECTOR & ANR

Appeal (Crl.), 162 of 2012, Judgment Date: Dec 12, 2014

Non-Reportable Full Judgment

Tags PC Act
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

VINAYAK NARAYAN DEOSTHALI Vs. C.B.I.

Appeal (Crl.), 346 of 2004, Judgment Date: Dec 02, 2014

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

ANTONY CARDOZA Vs. STATE OF KERALA

Appeal (Crl.), 19 of 2013, Judgment Date: Nov 14, 2014

Full Judgment

Tags PC Act
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

B. JAYARAJ Vs STATE OF A.P.

Appeal (Crl.), CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 696 OF 2014 of 2012, Judgment Date: Mar 28, 2014

7. In so far as the offence under Section 7 is concerned, it is a settled position in law that demand of illegal gratification is sine qua non to constitute the said offence and mere recovery of currency notes cannot constitute the offence under Section 7 unless it is proved beyond all reasonable doubt that the accused voluntarily accepted the money knowing it to be a bribe. Mere possession and recovery of the currency notes from the accused without proof of demand Full Judgment

Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)

Kamlesh Chandrakar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

CRR->CRIMINAL REVISION, 80 of 2014, Judgment Date: Feb 14, 2014

Full Judgment

Tags Revision
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

State through CBI New Delhi Vs Jitender Kumar Singh

Appeal (Crl.), 943 of 2008, Judgment Date: Feb 05, 2014

The Special Judge appointed under Section 3(1) could exercise the powers under sub-section (3) to Section 4 to try non-PC offence. Therefore, trying a case by a Special Judge under Section 3(1) is a sine-qua-non for exercising jurisdiction by the Special Judge for trying any offence, other than an offence specified in Section 3. “Trying any case” under Section 3(1) is, therefore, a jurisdictional fact for the Special Judge Full Judgment