Judgments - PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, 1988

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Vs. CHAUDHARI RAN BEER SINGH AND ANR.

Appeal (Crl.), 697 of 2011, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015

Tags Corruption

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

K.L BAKOLIA Vs. STATE TH. DIRECTOR,C.B.I.

AA, 797 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 15, 2015

For coming to the finding of guilt for the offence under Section 13(1)(d) of the Act, firstly, there must be a demand and secondly, there must be acceptance in the sense that the accused received illegal gratification. Full Judgment

Tags Corruption PC Act

Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)

Dilip Kumar Diwan Vs State of chhattisgarh

MCRC->MISC. CRIMINAL CASE, 1782 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 15, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Corruption Bail

Karnataka High Court (Single Judge)

SELVI J. JAYALALITHA Vs STATE, BY THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIGILANCE AND ANTI-CORRUPTION SPECIAL INVESTIGATION CELL CHENNAI

Criminal Appeal, 835 of 2014, Judgment Date: May 11, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Corruption

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF A.P. Vs. P.VENKATESHWARLU

Appeal (Crl.), 1317 of 2008, Judgment Date: May 06, 2015

The demand and acceptance of the amount as illegal gratification is a sine qua non for constituting an offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The prosecution is duty bound to establish that there was illegal offer of bribe and acceptance thereof and it has to be founded on facts. The offence under Section 7 of P.C. Act has been confirmed by the Full Judgment

Tags Corruption PC Act

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Vs. KESAVAPATNAM CHINA SWAMY

Appeal (Crl.), 89 of 2009, Judgment Date: May 06, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Corruption PC Act

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

M/S Hcl Infosystem Ltd. Vs. C.B.I.

APPLICATION U/s 482, 6623 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 01, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Corruption PC Act Quashing Of Criminal Proceedings

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

K. ANBAZHAGAN Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS

Appeal (Crl.), 637 of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 27, 2015

We are called upon in this appeal to decide whether the 4th respondent was authorised to represent the case of the prosecution in the High Court of Karnataka in the appeals filed by the accused persons against their conviction by the Special Court, and if he was not so authorised, whether Full Judgment

Tags Public Prosecutor Corruption

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

KEDARI LAL Vs. STATE OF MP

Appeal (Crl.), 782 of 2011, Judgment Date: Mar 23, 2015

The expression "known sources of income" in Section 13(1) (e) of the Act has two elements, first the income must be received from a lawful source and secondly the receipt of such income must have been intimated in accordance with the provisions of law, rules or orders for the time being applicable to the public servant. The categories so enumerated are illustrative. Receipt by way of share Full Judgment

Tags Acquittal Corruption Disproportionate Assets

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)