Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CRL.M.C., 3790
of 2014, Judgment Date: Sep 10, 2015
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
W.P.(CRL), 446
of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 09, 2015
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CRL.M.C., 3677,13037
of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 08, 2015
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
W.P.(CRL), 1537,611
of 2012, Judgment Date: Sep 07, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1917
of 2008, Judgment Date: Aug 31, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1496
of 2009, Judgment Date: Aug 28, 2015
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CRL.REV.P., 196
of 2012, Judgment Date: Aug 28, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION, 29365
of 2015, Judgment Date: Aug 21, 2015
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE, 2277
of 2015, Judgment Date: Aug 21, 2015
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CRL.M.C., 3349,11959
of 2015, Judgment Date: Aug 19, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 955
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 24, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1867
of 2012, Judgment Date: Jul 24, 2015
A plain reading of Section 19(1) (supra) leaves no manner of doubt
that the same is couched in mandatory terms and forbids courts from taking
cognizance of any offence punishable under Sections 7, 10, 11, 13 and 15
against public servants except with the previous sanction of the competent
authority enumerated in clauses (a), (b) and (c) to sub-section (1) of
Section 19. The provision contained Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE, 2053,8434
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 22, 2015
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
MCRC->MISC. CRIMINAL CASE, 3094,3098,3209,3102,3185
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 16, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
APPLICATION U/s 482, 16803
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 10, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
APPLICATION U/s 482, 17361
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 10, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 697
of 2011, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015
It is further well established that where misconduct is proved, the
alleged enmity between the complainant and the delinquent officer is
immaterial. (See B. Hanumantha Rao v. State of A.P.[4]).
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 697
of 2011, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
AA, 797
of 2015, Judgment Date: May 15, 2015
For coming to the finding of guilt for the offence under
Section 13(1)(d) of the Act, firstly, there must be a demand and secondly,
there must be acceptance in the sense that the accused received illegal
gratification. Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
MCRC->MISC. CRIMINAL CASE, 1782
of 2015, Judgment Date: May 15, 2015
Full Judgment
