Judgments - INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947
Ajeet Singh Chauhan And 2 Ors Vs The State Of U.P. And 4 Others
VIRENDER SINGH Vs M/S LANCER CONVENT SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL
RAJESH KUMAR GANDHI Vs SHRIRAM INSTITUTE FOR INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH
Devraj Gupta Vs State of Chhattisgarh
M/S ARIANE ORGACHEM PVT.LTD. Vs. WYETH EMPLOYEES UNION & ORS
“When a question of law is raised for the first time in a court of last resort, upon the construction of a document, or upon facts either admitted or proved beyond controversy, it is not only competent but expedient, in the interests of justice, to entertain the plea.” Therefore, with regard to the above mentioned aspect regarding the plea of the competency of the Deputy Labour Commissioner to pass an Full Judgment
GAURI SHANKER Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Whether the Labour Court was justified in not awarding backwages and granting Rs.2,500/- as compensation in lieu of backwages though it has awarded reinstatement in the absence of gainful employment of workman? Whether the High Court in exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227, is justified in interfering with the finding of facts recorded on the points of dispute recorded by the Labour Full Judgment
STATE OF U.P.& ORS. Vs. ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA & ORS.
Management of Sundaram Industries Ltd Versus Sundaram Industries Employees Union
Bsnl Versus Bhurumal
It is trite law that when the termination is found to be illegal because of non-payment of retrenchment compensation and notice pay as mandatorily required under Section 25-F of theIndustrial Disputes Act, even after reinstatement, it is always open to the management to terminate the services of that employee by paying him the retrenchment compensation. Since such a workman was working on daily wage basis and even afterhe is reinstated, he has no right to seek regularization. Thus when he Full Judgment