Judgments - INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947
UTTAR PRADESH RAJKIYA NIRMAN NIGAM LTD. VERSUS RAJENDRA TIWARI
THE DIRECTOR STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. VERSUS ISPAT KHANDAN JANTA MAZDOOR UNION
DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION VERSUS SH. MOOL CHAND
Sunil Kumar Biswas VERSUS Ordinance Factory Board & Ors.
Dilip Mani Dubey VERSUS M/s SIEL Ltd. & Anr.
TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY BOARD REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN VERSUS TNEB-THOZHILALAR AYKKIYA SANGAM BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY
Bundi Zila Petrol Pump Dealers Association Bundi VERSUS Sanyojak Bundi Zila Petrol Mazdoor Sangh(B.M.S.)
BADRI VISHAL PANDEY AND ORS VERSUS RAJESH MITTAL AND ORS
Pratibha Syntex Ltd. Vs State of M.P. & others
Management of the Barara Cooperative MarketingcumProcessing Society Ltd Versus Workman Pratap Singh
Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Ltd. VERSUS Engineering Workers’ Association & Ors.
MANAGEMENT, HINDUSTAN MACHINE TOOLS LTD. VERSUS GHANSHYAM SHARMA
M/s S.Kumars Ltd. Vs. Bherulal
Law Laid down - (1) Before effecting change of service conditions of the workman in respect of any matter specified in Fourth Schedule appended to Industrial Disputes Act, notice has to be issued in compliance of section 9A of the Industrial Disputes Act. (2) The illegal change in service conditions of the Workman in the manner prejudicial and detrimental to his rights and interest amounts to unfair labour practice, on the part of the Management as detailed in item Nos.6 and 7 of Full Judgment
Novartis India Limited Vs. Vipin Shrivastava & others
Law Laid Down - The supervisory capacity necessarily has to be examined keeping in view the manual, unskilled, skilled, clerical work and the person performing such work is a “workman”. Meeting different professionals to promote sale of product of Pharmaceutical Company cannot be said to be manual or clerical work done by the Medical Representatives as it requires knowledge of product, its uses and also persuasive skills. May be, the Medical Representative does not supervise any person but he is the Full Judgment
The Management of Regional Chief Engineer P.H.E.D. Ranchi VERSUS Their Workmen Rep. by District Secretary
Bhartiya Drugs and Chemicals Shramik Karmchari Parishad Vs.State of M.P.& others
Food Corporation of India VERSUS Gen. Secy, FCI India Employees Union & Ors.
Narsingh v/s Vikram Viswavidyalaya
State of M.P. Vs. Rajendra Kumar Jain
Law Laid Down - “Whether a daily-wager who is declared permanent by way of classification, by the employer, merely on completion of 240 days of service as daily-wager, without any judicial intervention is entitled to claim salary alongwith increments in the regular pay-scale admissible to a civil post or is merely entitled to salary equivalent to the minimum of the regular pay-scale without increments and in this backdrop whether the impugned orders granting benefit of regular pay-scale with increments are liable to be Full Judgment