Judgments - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860
Ramcharan Patel Vs. State of M.P.
Law laid down - (1) Section 302, 120B and Section 201 of IPC : Vikki Bai was not traceable from matrimonial house and hence her father-in-law lodged "Gum Insaan" report in Police Station. Father of Vikki Bai also lodged the report that she is murdered by appellants. Body or remains of Vikki Bai could never be traced. The court below held the appellants as guilty on the basis of circumstantial evidence. Held : Conclusion of guilt must be based on circumstances Full Judgment
KALICHARAN @ KALKA PRASAD VERSUS THE STATE (G.N.C.T. OF DELHI)
DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (APPELLATE AUTHORITY) VERSUS AJAI KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
HARI OM @ HERO VERSUS STATE OF U.P.
Murali VERSUS State rep. by the Inspector of Police
Lala @ Daneshwar Versus State of Chhattisgarh
Criminal courts should not issue non-bailable warrant of arrest straightway at the first instance and investigating officer should inform the accused about filing of charge-sheet specially when he is on bail Full Judgment
CD PHARMA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
GUNVEEN SINGH VERSUS THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)& ANR
Zaid Pathan and others Vs. State of M.P
Law laid down - Section 195(1) Cr.P.C. is attracted at the stage of taking cognizance. There is no bar under Section 195 of the Cr.P.C. in respect of registration of FIR, therefore, FIR for an offence under Section 188 of the IPC can be registered by the police and after investigation on the basis of the FIR and the material collected during the course of investigation, a competent public servant can file the complaint before the concerned court. What is barred Full Judgment