Judgments - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860
Indu @ Indrapal Singh and another Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh
In Reference (Suo Moto) Vs. Manoj
OM PRAKASH DHANUKA Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR
(1) Smt. Guddi Rawat (2) Virendra Rawat Versus State of MP
Law laid down - (1) As Section 306 of IPC makes abatement of commission of suicide punishable, therefore, for making a person liable for an offence punishable under Section 306 IPC, it is a duty of the prosecution to establish that such person has abated the commission of suicide and for the purpose of determining the act of the accused it is necessary to see that his act must fall in any of the 3 categories as enumerated under Section 107 of Full Judgment
PRUTHIVIRAJ JAYANTIBHAI VANOL Vs. DINESH DAYABHAI VALA AND OTHERS
INDRA DEVI VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.
Lakshman Singh Versus State of Bihar (now Jharkhand)
Somesh Chaurasia Versus State of M.P. & Anr. - 22/07/2021
KUMER SINGH Versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.
Rajesh Versus State of M.P.
THREE C HOMES PVT. LTD. VERSUS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 6, NEW DELHI
UMED SINGH VERSUS STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR
Pramod Kumar Lihkhar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law Laid Down - While framing a charge, the Court is expected to apply its mind to the entire record and documents placed therewith before the Court. No meticulous examination of evidence is needed for considering whether the case would end in conviction or not. However, the Court is required to consider and apply its judicial mind, whether the allegations taken as a whole will, prima facie constitute an offence and if so, whether continuation of proceedings is an abuse of Full Judgment
Mamta Nair Versus State of Rajasthan & Anr.
Arjun Kumar @ Prince Vs. The State Of Bihar
Nandkishore s/o Ganesh Ram Meghwal Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - In case of issuance of summons/warrants against government employee/officer, the prosecution fails to procure their presence in Court, their salary/pension, as the case may be, can be withheld, if it is found that the government official is avoiding the summons/warrants. Full Judgment