Judgments - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860
ANUJ KUMAR GUPTA @ SETHI GUPTA Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVT. OF BIHAR, OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA
The State of M. P. vs. Sanjay
Law laid down - Where the minimum sentence is less than 10 years but the maximum sentence is not death or life imprisonment then Section 167 (2) (a) (ii) will apply and the accused will be entitled to grant of “default bail” after 60 days in case charge-sheet is not filed. In view of the same, since the maximum sentence provided u/s.467 of IPC is life imprisonment, regardless that the minimum sentence is less then 10 years, the period of filing Full Judgment
Ashok Singh S/o Raghuveer Singh Yadav Versus State of Madhya Pradesh
Gulab Versus State of Uttar Pradesh
M/S SUVARNA COOPERATIVE BANK LTD Versus STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.
BHAGCHANDRA VERSUS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
THE STATE BY S.P. THROUGH THE SPE CBI VERSUS UTTAMCHAND BOHRA
Hirdayshay Vs. Nutanbai
Law laid down - Held : 1. The husband and wife lived together only for about two years intermittently, since February, 1988 and thereafter, the husband had to either serve the notice or to take the recourse of issuance of search warrant through S.D.M. Despite making persistent efforts to persuade wife to return, she did not join the company of husband and she filed two cases against the husband, both resulted in dismissal. Thus, the intention of wife is clear i.e to Full Judgment
Anil Kumar Kanojia Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - 1.Evidence of a witness examined in other trial can be relied and used only when exigencies provided under Section 299 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 are fulfilled i.e. if it is proved that witness had absconded or died or there is no immediate prospect of arresting him, without an amount of delay, expense or inconvenience which, under the circumstances of the case, would be unreasonable. 2.If the eventualities mentioned in Section 299(1) of the Code of Criminal Full Judgment
JASBIR SINGH @ JASSA ETC. VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS
Kuljit Singh & Anr. Versus The State of Punjab
Shivram Singh Rajawat Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Nafees Khan and another Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh
The State of Maharashtra VERSUS Pankaj Jagshi Gangar
ASHIM @ ASIM KUMAR HARANATH BHATTACHARYA VERSUS NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY
TAIJUDDIN Versus STATE OF ASSAM & ORS.
Phool Singh Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh
VINOD KUMAR v. AMRITPAL @ CHHOTU & ORS.
Akram S/o Amanat Khan & Fazal S/o Taki Khan Vs. State of M.P.
Law Laid Down - Chance Witness- Interested witnessEvidentiary value - (i) If presence of witness is satisfactorily established, his statement cannot be discarded by treating him as mere “chance witness”. The expression ‘chance witnesses’ is borrowed from countries where every man’s home is considered his castle and every one must have an explanation for his presence elsewhere or in another man’s castle. It is a most unsuitable expression in a country whose people are less formal and more casual. (Judgment of Supreme Full Judgment