Judgments - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860
ANITA RANI Versus ASHOK KUMAR & ORS.
Shiv Kumar Singh and another Vs. State of M.P.
Law laid down - For the purpose of invoking the provisions of Section 65 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the conditions of Section 63 has to be satisfied first then only secondary evidence can be allowed. Full Judgment
ANUP SAHU @ ANUP LAL SAH and ORS Vs. STATE OF BIHAR
JAIKAM KHAN VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
LOCHAN SHRIVAS VERSUS THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Mirza Iqbal @ Golu & Anr. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr
Kamal Singh Rawat Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Kuldeep Singh Rajawat Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
MOHAN @SRINIVAS @ SEENA @TAILOR SEENA VERSUS THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
N. Raghavender VERSUS State of Andhra Pradesh, CBI
ANUJ KUMAR GUPTA @ SETHI GUPTA Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVT. OF BIHAR, OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA
The State of M. P. vs. Sanjay
Law laid down - Where the minimum sentence is less than 10 years but the maximum sentence is not death or life imprisonment then Section 167 (2) (a) (ii) will apply and the accused will be entitled to grant of “default bail” after 60 days in case charge-sheet is not filed. In view of the same, since the maximum sentence provided u/s.467 of IPC is life imprisonment, regardless that the minimum sentence is less then 10 years, the period of filing Full Judgment
Ashok Singh S/o Raghuveer Singh Yadav Versus State of Madhya Pradesh
Gulab Versus State of Uttar Pradesh
M/S SUVARNA COOPERATIVE BANK LTD Versus STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.
BHAGCHANDRA VERSUS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
THE STATE BY S.P. THROUGH THE SPE CBI VERSUS UTTAMCHAND BOHRA
Hirdayshay Vs. Nutanbai
Law laid down - Held : 1. The husband and wife lived together only for about two years intermittently, since February, 1988 and thereafter, the husband had to either serve the notice or to take the recourse of issuance of search warrant through S.D.M. Despite making persistent efforts to persuade wife to return, she did not join the company of husband and she filed two cases against the husband, both resulted in dismissal. Thus, the intention of wife is clear i.e to Full Judgment
Anil Kumar Kanojia Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - 1.Evidence of a witness examined in other trial can be relied and used only when exigencies provided under Section 299 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 are fulfilled i.e. if it is proved that witness had absconded or died or there is no immediate prospect of arresting him, without an amount of delay, expense or inconvenience which, under the circumstances of the case, would be unreasonable. 2.If the eventualities mentioned in Section 299(1) of the Code of Criminal Full Judgment