Filter by Date
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Bachcha Lal Pasi Vs State Of U.P. & Another

APPLICATION U/s 482, 16904 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 29, 2015

Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Smt. Meena Devi And 2 Others Vs State Of U.P. & Another

APPLICATION U/s 482, 16905 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 29, 2015

Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Rohit Advani And Another Vs State Of U.P. & 2 Others

APPLICATION U/s 482, 16906 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 29, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

JAGTAR SINGH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

Appeal (Crl.), 86 of 2013, Judgment Date: Jun 19, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Conviction
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Ravi Singh Tomar Vs The State Of Madhya Prades

MCRC, 7957 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 19, 2015

Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Ashutosh Kumar Pandey Vs. The State Of U.P

BAIL, 4810 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 15, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Bail
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Shri Prakash Tiwari Vs. State Of U.P.

BAIL, 3688 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 09, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Bail
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Rajendra Prasad Misra Vs. The State Of U.P

SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE, 4568 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 08, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Bail
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Molahey Ram Gautam Vs. The State Of U.P

BAIL, 4572 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 08, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Bail
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Chhotu Vs. The State Of U.P

BAIL, 4574 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 08, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Bail
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Pappu Singh @ Babulal Vs. State Of U.P. & Another

APPLICATION U/s 482, 16210 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 05, 2015

Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Pappu Vs. State Of U.P.

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION, 19189 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 01, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Bail
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

INDRA DALAL Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

Appeal (Crl.), 1261 of 2009, Judgment Date: May 29, 2015

The word 'confession' has no where been defined. However, the courts have resorted to the dictionary meaning and explained that incriminating statements by the accused to the police suggesting the inference of the commission of the crime would amount to confession and, therefore, inadmissible under this provision. It is also defined to mean Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

PREM SINGH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

Appeal (Crl.), 569 of 2014, Judgment Date: May 29, 2015

Insofar as circumstances leading to connecting the appellant with the said murder are concerned, following evidence has come on record: (i) Brother of the deceased i.e. PW-9 had seen the appellant working in the fields which are adjacent to the fields of victim's family where Sunita had gone to collect Barseem. (ii) The appellant was keeping an evil eye on the deceased. (iii) The sickle, weapon used in the murder, Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

BIJENDRA BHAGAT Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Appeal (Crl.), 2202 of 2011, Judgment Date: May 29, 2015

According to the witnesses these two accused were also armed with country made pistols. The injuries suffered by the deceased are incised wounds and one fire arm injury. However, none of the injuries on the person of the deceased could be attributed to the lathi which was supposedly in the hands of the appellant. Undoubtedly, three injuries on the person Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Sandeep and Anr. Vs State of Haryana

Appeal (Crl.), 1554 of 2014, Judgment Date: May 26, 2015

The incompatibility or inconsistency can be said to arise if the assertions in one dying declaration are so diametrically opposed to the statements in the other that both cannot stand together. 21. In view of the above, the law on the issue of dying declaration can be summarised to the effect that in case the court comes to the conclusion that the dying declaration is true and reliable, has been recorded Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Mohd. Naseem And Ors. Vs. The State Of U.P And Anr.

CRIMINAL MISC. CASE, 1654 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 26, 2015

It is not res integra that learned Magistrate while accepting the final report can treat the protest petition as complaint. It is not in dispute that by accepting the final report, the order of taking cognizance has been passed. The provisions of Section 300, Cr.P.C. could not be attracted. It is well settled principle of law that after accepting the final report, the Magistrate can proceed on the basis of complaint or on the basis of protest petition treating it Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Mahesh Thakur And 4 Others Vs. State Of U.P. & Another

APPLICATION U/s 482, 13953 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 21, 2015

From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicants. All the submissions made at the bar relate to the disputed questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 CR.P.C. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Kaptan Singh And 5 Others Vs. State Of U.P. & Another

APPLICATION U/s 482, 13977 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 21, 2015

From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicants. All the submissions made at the bar relate to the disputed questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 CR.P.C. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Anar Singh And Another Vs. State Of U.P.

APPLICATION U/s 482, 12717 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 20, 2015

Full Judgment