Judgments - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860
JAGTAR SINGH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
Ravi Singh Tomar Vs The State Of Madhya Prades
Pappu Singh @ Babulal Vs. State Of U.P. & Another
INDRA DALAL Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
The word 'confession' has no where been defined. However, the courts have resorted to the dictionary meaning and explained that incriminating statements by the accused to the police suggesting the inference of the commission of the crime would amount to confession and, therefore, inadmissible under this provision. It is also defined to mean Full Judgment
PREM SINGH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
Insofar as circumstances leading to connecting the appellant with the said murder are concerned, following evidence has come on record: (i) Brother of the deceased i.e. PW-9 had seen the appellant working in the fields which are adjacent to the fields of victim's family where Sunita had gone to collect Barseem. (ii) The appellant was keeping an evil eye on the deceased. (iii) The sickle, weapon used in the murder, Full Judgment
BIJENDRA BHAGAT Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
According to the witnesses these two accused were also armed with country made pistols. The injuries suffered by the deceased are incised wounds and one fire arm injury. However, none of the injuries on the person of the deceased could be attributed to the lathi which was supposedly in the hands of the appellant. Undoubtedly, three injuries on the person Full Judgment
Sandeep and Anr. Vs State of Haryana
The incompatibility or inconsistency can be said to arise if the assertions in one dying declaration are so diametrically opposed to the statements in the other that both cannot stand together. 21. In view of the above, the law on the issue of dying declaration can be summarised to the effect that in case the court comes to the conclusion that the dying declaration is true and reliable, has been recorded Full Judgment
Mohd. Naseem And Ors. Vs. The State Of U.P And Anr.
It is not res integra that learned Magistrate while accepting the final report can treat the protest petition as complaint. It is not in dispute that by accepting the final report, the order of taking cognizance has been passed. The provisions of Section 300, Cr.P.C. could not be attracted. It is well settled principle of law that after accepting the final report, the Magistrate can proceed on the basis of complaint or on the basis of protest petition treating it Full Judgment
Mahesh Thakur And 4 Others Vs. State Of U.P. & Another
From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicants. All the submissions made at the bar relate to the disputed questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 CR.P.C. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court Full Judgment
Kaptan Singh And 5 Others Vs. State Of U.P. & Another
From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicants. All the submissions made at the bar relate to the disputed questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 CR.P.C. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court Full Judgment