Judgments - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860

24. It is, therefore, well settled that the right to speedy trial in all criminal persecutions (sic prosecutions) is an inalienable right under Article 21 of the Constitution. This right is applicable not only to the actual proceedings in court but also includes within its sweep the preceding police investigations as well. The right to speedy trial extends equally Full Judgment

Tags Quashing Of Criminal Proceedings

Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)

Kuldeep Vs State of Chhattisgarh through District Magistrate, District Raigarh (CG).

CR->CIVIL REVISION, 569 of 2004, Judgment Date: Jul 06, 2015

Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Saurabh Verma Alias Shailendra Verma Vs The State Of U.P.

CRIMINAL APPEAL, 2591 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 06, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Single Judge)

STATE OF M.P Vs. MANISH & ORS

Appeal (Crl.), 860 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 06, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Quashing Of Criminal Proceedings

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

BASISTH NARYAN YADAV Vs. KAILASH RAI AND ORS

Appeal (Crl.), 67-70 of 2009, Judgment Date: Jul 03, 2015

We find that although the case of the prosecution suffers from many infirmities and there has been unexplained reluctance in bringing the relevant witnesses on record, apart from parents of the deceased, the doctor and the Investigating Officer, even Triloki Sharma and the Chowkidar who saw the accused persons disposing of the body of the deceased, have also not been examined. Yet we may not Full Judgment

Tags Dowry Death

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF M.P. Vs. KESHAR SINGH

Appeal (Crl.), 2244 of 2009, Judgment Date: Jul 03, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Rape

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF M.P. Vs. ANOOP SINGH

Appeal (Crl.), 442 of 2010, Judgment Date: Jul 03, 2015

With respect to this finding of the High Court, we are of the opinion that the High Court should have relied firstly on the documents as stipulated under Rule 12(3)(b) and only in the absence, the medical opinion should have been sought. We find that the Trial Court has also dealt with this aspect of the ossification test. The Trial Court noted that the respondent had cited Full Judgment

Tags Rape

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Vishal And 3 Others Vs State Of U.P. & Another

APPLICATION U/s 482, 17349 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 03, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Quashing Of Criminal Proceedings

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

S.R.SUKUMAR Vs. S.SUNAAD RAGHURAM

Appeal (Crl.), 844 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 02, 2015

7. Upon consideration of the rival contentions and materials on record, the points falling for determination are: (i) in the facts of the case, when did the Magistrate take cognizance of the complaint for the first time i.e. on 18.05.2007 or on 21.06.2007, when the Magistrate satisfied of a prima Full Judgment

Tags Complaint Case Cognizance

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)