Filter by Date
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

VIVEK SHARMA AND ORS Vs STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

CRL.M.C., 3892 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 21, 2015

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

DILIP @ MOGLI Vs GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI

BAIL APPLN., 1946 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 21, 2015

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

RATAN SINGH Vs STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

CRL.M.C., 3887 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 21, 2015

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

SANJEEV AGGARWL AND ORS Vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

CRL.M.C., 3894 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 21, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Cruelty
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

GAURAV RALHAN AND ORS Vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

CRL.M.C., 3909 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 21, 2015

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

LAXMI JAIN Vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

BAIL APPLN., 1967 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 21, 2015

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

ANUPAM ALIAS ANNU AND ANR Vs THE STATE GNCT OF DELHI AND ANR

CRL.M.C., 3896 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 21, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF M.P. Vs. MUNNA @ SHAMBHOO NATH

Appeal (Crl.), 658 of 2011, Judgment Date: Sep 18, 2015

In view of the evidence on record and the rationale in the aforementioned cases, we are of a considered view that the prosecution has totally failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the girl was less than 16 years of age at the time of the incident. Therefore, it can be held that the girl was more than 16 years of age and she was competent to give her consent Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs. CHAND BASHA

Appeal (Crl.), 1547 of 2011, Judgment Date: Sep 18, 2015

The prosecution story relies upon the ‘last seen together’ theory, which resulted into the death of Ganesh. This Court has time and again laid down the ingredients to be made out by the prosecution to prove the ‘last seen together’ theory. The Court for the purpose of arriving at a finding as to whether the said offence has been committed or not, may Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Pannelal Vs State Of U.P.

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION, 28940 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 18, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Bail
Allahabad High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Smt.Poonam Vs State Of U.P.Throu.Secy.Home Deptt.U.P.Lko.And Ors.

HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION, 156 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 17, 2015

Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Ram Singh Vs State Of U.P.

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION, 15663 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 17, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE (GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI) Vs. NITIN GUNWANT SHAH

Appeal (Crl.), 951-952 of 2007, Judgment Date: Sep 16, 2015

This Court has time and again laid down the ingredients to be made out by the prosecution to prove criminal conspiracy. It is now, however, well settled that a conspiracy ordinarily is hatched in secrecy. The Court for the purpose of arriving at a finding as to whether the said Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Manoj @ Manu And 2 Ors. Vs State Of U.P. And Another

APPLICATION U/s 482, 27871 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 16, 2015

Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Darshan Singh And 3 Ors. Vs Additional Commissioner (Judicial)

MISC. COMPANY APPLICATION, 5377 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 16, 2015

Full Judgment

Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)

Smt. Vani Rao Vs Shri Amar Agarwal

EP->ELECTION PETITION, 09 of 2014, Judgment Date: Sep 16, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Election
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Ram Khelawan @ Chhotu & 8 Ors. Vs State Of U.P. & Anr.

APPLICATION U/s 482, 4478 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 15, 2015

Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Ram Khelawan @ Chhotu & 8 Ors. Vs State Of U.P. & Anr.

APPLICATION U/s 482, 4478 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 15, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

BHANUBEN AND ANR Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT

Appeal (Crl.), 1209 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 14, 2015

Merely because an accused has been held liable to be punished under Section 498A IPC, it does not follow that on the same evidence, he must also and necessarily be held guilty of having abetted the commission of suicide by the women concerned under 306 IPC. Therefore, the conviction and sentence for offence punishable under Section 306 read with Section 114 of the Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Karan Singh Vs Union Of India Thru Secy. And 3 Others

HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION, 3002 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 11, 2015

Full Judgment