Judgments - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860
SUSHILA & ORS Vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS
STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs. F.NATARAJ
In the present case, the gaps in the evidences of the prosecutrix and the medical officer make it highly improbable that sexual intercourse took place. It would be erroneous to rely upon such discrepant testimonies and convict the accused. It can thus be stated with certitude that the solitary evidence of the prosecutrix, in absence of any corroboration by the medical evidence, is not of such quality which can be Full Judgment
D.THAMODARAN Vs. KANDASAMY & ANR
SATYA PAL SINGH Vs. STATE OF M.P. AND ORS
“whether the appellant herein, being the father of the deceased, has statutory right to prefer an appeal to the High Court against the order of acquittal under proviso to Section 372 of Cr.P.C. without obtaining the leave of the High Court as required under sub-Section (3) to Section 378 of Cr.P.C.”, this Court is of the view that the right of questioning Full Judgment
DINESH LAL Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
BABU LAL AGGARWAL Vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
SHYAM SUNDER TYAGI Vs THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
VIMAL KUMAR & ORS Vs THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR
JAI KUMAR & ORS Vs STATE, GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
NEERAJ KUMAR AND ORS Vs STATE AND ORS
VIJAY KUMAR WADHAWAN Vs STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & Anr.
SUDHIR Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.
Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, and after considering the gravity of the offence, circumstances of the case, particularly, the allegations of corruption and misappropriation of public funds released for rural development, and further considering the conduct of the appellants and the fact that the investigation is held up as the custodial interrogation of the appellants could not be done due to Full Judgment