Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 668
of 2011, Judgment Date: Jan 11, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1592-1593
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jan 08, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 101-102
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 08, 2016
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
APPLICATION U/s 482, 153
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 07, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 17
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 07, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 15
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 07, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 49-50
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 07, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 2099
of 2008, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2016
The word alibi means “elsewhere”. The plea of alibi is not one of
the General Exceptions contained in Chapter IV of IPC. It is a rule of
evidence recognized under Section 11 of the Evidence Act. However, plea of
alibi taken by the defence is required to be proved only after prosecution
has proved its case against the accused. In the present case said condition
is fulfilled. Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 436
of 2008, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 11
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 14
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2016
it is clear that the High Court has recorded the concurrent findings on the
charges framed against the Appellant in the impugned judgment and order. It
has also failed to re-appreciate the evidence on record properly and
consider the law on the relevant aspect of the case. Therefore, the said
findings are not only erroneous in law but also suffer from error in law.
Hence, the same is Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL, 58
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 13
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 9-10
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 244
of 2009, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 12
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 05, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1828-1829
of 2013, Judgment Date: Dec 16, 2015
It is a settled law that dying
declaration can be the sole basis of conviction and it does not require
any corroboration. But it is equally true that dying declaration goes
against the cardinal principle of law that 'evidence must be direct'.
Thus, dying declaration must be judged and appreciated in light of the
surrounding circumstances Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 548-551
of 2013, Judgment Date: Dec 16, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1033
of 2010, Judgment Date: Dec 16, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 2230
of 2011, Judgment Date: Dec 16, 2015
Full Judgment
