Judgments - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860
C.B.I.,BANK SECURITIES & FRAUD CELL Vs. RAMESH GELLI & OR
While there can be no manner of doubt that in the Objects and Reasons stated for enactment of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 it has been made more than clear that the Act, inter alia, envisages widening of the scope of the definition of public servant, nevertheless, the mere performance of public duties by the holder of any office cannot bring the incumbent Full Judgment
GULZARI LAL Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
NOORAHAMMAD AND ORS Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA
DHARAM PAL Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS
STATE OF RAJASTHAN Vs. RAM KAILASH @ RAM VILAS
POOJA PAL Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
This Court in Babubhai (supra) while examining the scope of Section 173(8) of the Code, did recall its observations in Manu Sharma vs. State (NCT of Delhi), (2010) 6 SCC 1, that it is not only the responsibility of the investigating agency but as well as of the courts to ensure, that investigation is fair and does not in any way hamper the Full Judgment
BOBBILI RAMAKRISHNA RAJU YADAV & ORS. Vs. STATE OF A P REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF A P HYDERBAD A P AND AN
STATE OF ASSAM Vs. RAMEN DOWARAH
USMANGANI ADAMBHAI VAHORA Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
PRIYANKA CHAWLA Vs. AMIT CHAWLA
SUDIP KR. SEN @ BILTU Vs. STATE OF W.B. & ORS.
AWADESH KUMAR JHA @ AKHILESH KUMAR JHA & ANR. Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR
DARSHAN SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
The word alibi means “elsewhere”. The plea of alibi is not one of the General Exceptions contained in Chapter IV of IPC. It is a rule of evidence recognized under Section 11 of the Evidence Act. However, plea of alibi taken by the defence is required to be proved only after prosecution has proved its case against the accused. In the present case said condition is fulfilled. Full Judgment