Judgments - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860
ASHIQ HUSSAIN FAKTOO Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The principle of ex debito justitiae is founded on a recognition of a debt that the justice delivery system owes to a litigant to correct an error in a judicial dispensation. Its application, by the very nature of things, cannot be made to depend on varying perceptions of legal omissions and commissions but such recognition of the debt which have the potential of opening new vistas of Full Judgment
State of Chhattisgarh Vs . Sunil @ Balikaran Sahu & Anr.
Bennet Castelino Vs State Of U.P. Thru. The Secy. Min. Of Law & Justice & Ors.
BHARWAD NAVGHANBHAJ JAKSHIBHAI & ORS. Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT
BRIJ LAL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Every accused is presumed to be innocent unless his guilt is proved. The presumption of innocence is a human right. Subject to the statutory exceptions, the said principle forms the basis of criminal jurisprudence in India. The nature of the offence, its seriousness and gravity has to be taken into consideration. The appellate court should bear in mind the presumption of innocence Full Judgment
KALA @ CHANDRAKALA Vs. STATE TR.INSP.OF POLICE
The prosecution has not been able to complete the chain of circumstances so as to fasten the guilt and to prove the commission of offence by the appellant beyond periphery of doubt. The appellant is acquitted giving her the benefit of doubt. Full Judgment
KRITIKA PADODE AND ANR Vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
BHAJAN LAL SHARMA V/s STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS
In my view, quashing the FIR in question at this stage would certainly send a very wrong signal not only to the petitioner, but the whole society at large and particularly to other builders, contractors and other agencies engaged in undertaking construction work, that even if they are grossly negligent in taking preventive measures so as to prevent predictable accidents – which may lead to serious injury and even loss of life, they could get away by paying some compensation Full Judgment
SUDHIR CHAUDHARY ETC. ETC. Vs. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) - IPC - Section 420
BABY @ SEBASTIAN & ANR. Vs. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ADIMALY - IPC-Section 302
SUKH RAM Vs. STATE OF H.P. - IPC - Section 468,471
DEVRAJ Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH - IPC - Section 302, 201
RAHUL & Ors. V/s UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Smt. Manju Yadav Thru' Its Husband Yogendra Yadav V/s State Of U.P. & 2 Others
MUTHURAMALINGAM & ORS. Vs. STATE REP.BY INSP.OF POLICE
“Whether consecutive life sentences can be awarded to a convict on being found guilty of a series of murders for which he has been tried in a single trial?.” 17. The legal position is, thus, fairly well settled that imprisonment for life is a sentence for the remainder of the life of the offender unless of course the remaining sentence is commuted or remitted by the competent authority. That being Full Judgment