Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1358
of 2008, Judgment Date: Jun 03, 2016
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION, 18063
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jun 02, 2016
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CRL.A., 723,724
of 2014, Judgment Date: Jun 01, 2016
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CRL.A., 1026
of 2013, Judgment Date: Jun 01, 2016
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CRL.A., 850
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 01, 2016
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 1971
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 01, 2016
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 929
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jun 01, 2016
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
JAIL APPEAL, 440
of 2016, Judgment Date: May 31, 2016
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CRL.A., 254
of 2016, Judgment Date: May 25, 2016
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CRL.A., 177
of 2015, Judgment Date: May 24, 2016
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
CRL.A., 878
of 2001, Judgment Date: May 19, 2016
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CRL.REV.P., 714,8075
of 2015, Judgment Date: May 19, 2016
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CRL.A., 1316,198,3,95,
of 2015, Judgment Date: May 19, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 531
of 2016, Judgment Date: May 18, 2016
Held
First, it is not in dispute that appellant No. 1 is aged around 75 years; Second, out of three accused two have expired; Third, litigation is pending for quite some time; Fourth, appellant No. 1 has undergone five months in jail.
The impugned order is modified insofar as it relates to awarding of the sentence to appellant no. 1. Appellant no. 1 is accordingly awarded rigorous imprisonment for 1 (one) year with a fine amount of Rs.10,000/-. In default of payment Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 750
of 2006, Judgment Date: May 17, 2016
Held
We are constrained to observe that the High Court grossly erred in passing the impugned order without assigning any reason. In our considered opinion, it was a clear case of total non application of mind to the case by the learned Judges because the order impugned neither sets out the facts nor the submissions of the parties nor the findings and nor the reasons as to why the leave to file appeal is declined to the appellant. We, therefore, disapprove Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CRL.A., 366, 388, 392,393, 398, 399,400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405 ,406,407,408,437 439,390,391
of 2009, Judgment Date: May 16, 2016
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CRL.A., 1208
of 2013, Judgment Date: May 16, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Transfer Petition (Crl.), 351
of 2013, Judgment Date: May 12, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 462
of 2016, Judgment Date: May 12, 2016
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
WPCR->WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL [ OTHER MATTER ], 8
of 2016, Judgment Date: May 12, 2016
Full Judgment
