Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 8232-8234
of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 12, 2017
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
CRA, 278
of 2009, Judgment Date: Jan 12, 2017
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
MCRC, 4708
of 2014, Judgment Date: Jan 12, 2017
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
MCRC, 7240
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jan 12, 2017
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
CRR, 2895
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 11, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 64
of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 10, 2017
As rightly pointed out by the learned counsel for the parties on the
strength of law laid down by this Court in the case of Daulat Ram vs.
State of Punjab, (AIR 1962 SC 1206) that in order to prosecute an accused
for an offence punishable under Section 182 IPC, it is mandatory to follow
the procedure prescribed under Section 195 of the Code else such action is
rendered Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
MCRC, 10477
of 2014, Judgment Date: Jan 10, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 39
of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2017
“Age determination inquiry” contemplated under Section 7-A of the Act
read with Rule 12 of the 2007 Rules enables the court to seek evidence and
in that process, the court can obtain the matriculation or equivalent
certificates, if available. Only in the absence of any matriculation or
equivalent certificates, the court needs to obtain the date of birth
certificate from the Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1953
of 2010, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2017
The identification
parade itself was held 25 days after the arrest. Their chance meeting was
also in the night without there being any special occasion for them to
notice the features of any of the accused which would then register in
their minds so as to enable them to identify them on a future date. The
chance meeting was also for few Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 32-33
of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2017
Performance of judicial duty in the manner prescribed by law is
fundamental to the concept of rule of law in a democratic State. It has
been quite often said and, rightly so, that the judiciary is the protector
and preserver of rule of law. Effective functioning of the said sacrosanct
duty has been entrusted to the judiciary and that entrustment expects the
courts to conduct Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court
MCRC, 7050
of 2011, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2017
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
MCRC, 7200
of 2011, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2017
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
MCRC, 7418
of 2010, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2017
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
MCRC, 7900
of 2008, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2017
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
MCRC, 19114
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 06, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1448
of 2010, Judgment Date: Jan 04, 2017
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
MCRC, 3593
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 04, 2017
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
MCRC, 11379
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jan 04, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 467
of 2010, Judgment Date: Jan 03, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 985
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jan 03, 2017
Full Judgment
