Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1624-1625
of 2013, Judgment Date: Oct 20, 2016
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
W.P.(CRL), 2741,4601
of 2016, Judgment Date: Oct 18, 2016
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
MAT.APP.(F.C.), 63
of 2016, Judgment Date: Oct 07, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1266
of 2009, Judgment Date: Oct 06, 2016
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
MCRCA->MISC.CRIMINAL CASE (ANTICIPATORY BAIL), 549
of 2016, Judgment Date: Oct 06, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1516
of 2011, Judgment Date: Oct 04, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1767
of 2011, Judgment Date: Oct 04, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 919
of 2013, Judgment Date: Oct 03, 2016
In Dhan Raj @ Dhand vs. State of Haryana (2014) 6 SCC 745, one
of us (Hon. Ghose,J.) while dwelling on the imperatives of circumstantial
evidence ruled that the same has to be of highest order to satisfy the
test of proof in a criminal prosecution. It was underlined that such
circumstantial evidence should establish a complete unbroken Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1999-2000
of 2010, Judgment Date: Oct 03, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1531-1533
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 03, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 958
of 2016, Judgment Date: Oct 03, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 403
of 2010, Judgment Date: Sep 28, 2016
…For the present, it may be sufficient to state that the gist of the
offence of criminal conspiracy created under Section 120-A is a bare
agreement to commit an offence. It has been made punishable under Section
120-B. The offence of abetment created under the second clause of Section
107 requires that there must be something more than a Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 2126
of 2010, Judgment Date: Sep 23, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 162-163
of 2014, Judgment Date: Sep 23, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 9194
of 2016, Judgment Date: Sep 16, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4715
of 2011, Judgment Date: Sep 16, 2016
It is
well-settled that there is no legal bar to the conduct of the disciplinary
proceedings and criminal trial simultaneously. However, no straightjacket
formula can be spelt out and the Court has to keep in mind the broad
approach to be adopted in such matters on case to case basis. The contour
of the approach to be adopted by the Court has been delineated in series Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 292-293
of 2014, Judgment Date: Sep 16, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1584-1585
of 2014, Judgment Date: Sep 15, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 2135
of 2009, Judgment Date: Sep 09, 2016
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
W.P.(C), 1191
of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 07, 2016
Full Judgment
