Judgments - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Vs. SANJAY KUMAR ALIAS SUNNY
H.D. SIKAND (D) TH:LRS. Vs. C.B.I.& ANR.
SHARAT BABU DIGUMARTI Vs. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
MUTHURAMALINGAM & ORS. Vs. STATE REP.BY INSP.OF POLICE
GURCHARAN SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
There is thus neither any proximate nor remote acts of omission or commission on the part of the appellant and his family members that can be irrefutably construed to be a direct or indirect cause or factor compelling Surjit and her daughters to take the extreme step of self-elimination. It is thus manifest that the offence punishable is one of abetment of the commission of suicide by any person, predicating existence of a Full Judgment
GURPAL SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
Further, having regard to the root cause of the incident and the events that sequentially unfolded thereafter, we are of the comprehension that the appellant was overpowered by an uncontrollable fit of anger somuch so that he was deprived of his power of self-control and being drawn in a web of action reflexes, fired at the deceased and the injured, who were within his sight. The facts do not commend to Full Judgment
KHOKAN GIRI @ MADHAB Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Veena Vadini D.Ed College Prithvipur Distt. Tikamgarh Vs National Council For The Teacher Education
MUKARRAB ETC Vs. STATE OF U.P.
MOHD HASHIM Vs. STATE OF UP AND OTHERS
ANJAN DAS GUPTA Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.
STATE OF BIHAR Vs. RAJBALLAV PRASAD @ RAJBALLAV PD. YADAV @ RAJBALLABH YADAV
RAMESH AND ORS Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
K.V. PRAKASH BABU Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA
HARPAL SINGH @ CHHOTA Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
BAIJNATH AND ORS Vs. STATE OF M P
(38) A cumulative consideration of the overall evidence on the facet of dowry, leaves us unconvinced about the truthfulness of the charge qua the accused persons. The prosecution in our estimate, has failed to prove this indispensable component of the two offences beyond reasonable doubt. The factum of unnatural death in the matrimonial home and that too within seven years of marriage therefore is thus ipso facto not sufficient to Full Judgment