Judgments - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860
DR. JAYSHREE UJWAL INGOLE Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.
AJITSINH ARJUNSINH GOHIL Vs. BAR COUNCIL OF GUJARAT AND ANR.
HARI SHANKAR SHUKLA Vs. STATE OF U.P.
Smt.C.K.Rathi Vs. Sudarshan Jhawar and Another
Shiv Dhar and another Lal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Vijay Bahadur Singh Vs. M.P. Pollution Control Board
Gokuldas Vs. Atal Bihari & Anr.
Smt. Manju Devi Vs. State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Smt. Vimla Agnihotri Vs. Smt. Deepa Agnihotri and another
Mohansingh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Kavita Tiwari Vs. Meera Tiwari and another
VINEET KUMAR AND ORS Vs. STATE OF UP & ANR
Inherent power given to the High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is with the purpose and object of advancement of justice. In case solemn process of Court is sought to be abused by a person with some oblique motive, the Court has to thwart the attempt at the very threshold. The Court cannot permit a prosecution to go on if Full Judgment
KATTUKULANGARA MADHAVAN (DEAD)THR. LRS. Vs. MAJEED & ORS.
IN RE: Vs. TO ISSUE CERTAIN GUIDELINES REGARDING INADEQUACIES AND DEFICIENCIES IN CRIMINAL
GANESH SHAMRAO ANDEKAR & ANR. Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
KRISHNEGOWDA & ORS. Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ARKALGUD POLICE
It is settled law that mere latches on the part of Investigating Officer itself cannot be a ground for acquitting the accused. If that is the basis, then every criminal case will depend upon the will and design of the Investigating Officer. The Courts have to independently deal with the case and should arrive at a just conclusion beyond reasonable doubt basing on the evidence on record. Once there is Full Judgment