Judgments - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860
EJJADUR RAHMAN AND ANR VS THE STATE OF ASSAM
Shankarlal & Another Versus State of Madhya Pradesh
State through Central Bureau of Investigation Versus Dr. Anup Kumar Srivastava
Framing of charge is the first major step in a criminal trial where the court is expected to apply its mind to the entire record and documents placed therewith before the court. Taking cognizance of an offence has been stated to necessitate an application of mind by the court but framing of charge is a major event where the court considers the possibility of discharging the accused of the offence with which he is charged or requiring the accused to face trial. There are different categories Full Judgment
ASIF ALI KHAN @ SUFIYAN ALI Vs. THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Vs SYED RAHIM SYED JANIMIYA AND ORS
Sanjay Khanderao Wadane Versus State of Maharashtra
POPAT MANIKRAO KOKATE Vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS
Sangram & Ors Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - (1) Testimony of interested witnesses can be relied upon for conviction. (2) Some discrepancies in the testimony of witnesses which does not affect the case cannot be the basis for rejection of the evidence. Full Judgment
Mahipalsingh and Others Versus State of Madhya Pradesh
RAJIV KUMAR Versus STATE OF U.P. AND ANR.
The essential ingredients of the offence of criminal conspiracy are: (i) an agreement between two or more persons; (ii) the agreement must relate to doing or causing to be done either (a) an illegal act; or (b) an act which is not illegal in itself but is done by illegal means. It is, therefore, plain that meeting of minds of two or more persons for doing or causing to be done an illegal act or an act by illegal means Full Judgment